HomeMy WebLinkAbout1539-05 ASP - Deer Run EstatesCOUNTY OF NEWELL NO. 4
BYLAW NO. '1539-05
A BY-LAW OF THE COUNTY OF NEWELL N0.4, IN THE PROVINCE OF
ALBERTA, TO ADOPT AN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN FOR ± 10.52 HA
(25.99 AC) WITHIN PT. SW 1-19-14-W4. THIS IS TO BE KNOWN AS THE
DEER RUN ESTATES AREA STRUCTURE PLAN.
WHEREAS Council proposals to establish a framework for the orderly
subdivision and development of ± 10.52 ha (25.99 ac) within Pt. SW 1-19-
14-W4 located east of the Town of Brooks.
AND WHEREAS this Plan will identify existing development and will outline
the procedures and conditions under which subdivision and development
will allow to proceed.
AND WHEREAS the Area Structure Plan will establish the County Of
Newell's planning policies for this area which will be used by the land
owners as well as other Government and Municipal agencies and utility
companies in the formulation of their plans and priorities for development.
NOW THEREFORE be it resolved that this By-law receive first reading and
that the necessary Public Hearing be held to hear comments on this Plan.
Further be it resolved that this By-law receive second and third reading after
the Public Hearing and that this By-law take effect on final passing of the
By-law.
July 6, 2005 Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that Bylaw 1539-05 receive first reading.
August 25, 2005 Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that Bylaw 1539-05 receive second
reading.
August 25, 2005 Moved by Councillor Wutzke that Bylaw 1539-05 receive third and final
reading.
y ~s ~'~.
REEVE ff COUNTY ADMINI TRATOR
DEER RUN ESTATES
.,
' ~ AREA STRUCTURE PLAN
Pt. SW 1-19-14 W4
Submitted to:
County of Newell No. 4
_~ On behalf of:
Cory Baksa
Brooks, Alberta
.h,,`+
/ August 2005
DiLLON
CONSULTING
Deer Run Estates Area Structure Plan
DEER RUN ESTATES
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN
Pt. SW 1-19-14 W4
August 2005
(Final Version)
,---
- _ i - August 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pace
_. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. i
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................4
1.1 Area Structure Plans .............................................................................................4
1.1.1 Background ............................................................................................... 4
1.1.2 Purpose ...................................................................................................... 4
1.2 The Approval Process ........................................................................................... 5
1.3 Plan Implementation ............................................................................................. 5
- 1.4 Plan Review and Amendment ............................................................................... 5
1.5 Interpretation ......................................................................................................... 5
1.6 Legislative Framework ......................................................................................... 6
1.6.1 The Municipal Government Act ............................................................... 6
1.6.2 The County of Newell -Municipal Development Plan ............................ 6
-- 1.6.3 The County of Newell -Land Use Bylaw ................................................ 6
^ 1.6.4 The County of Newell -One Tree Road Area Structure Plan .................. 6
1.6.5 Town of Brooks Planning Considerations ................................................ 7
2.0 THE STI'E .........................................................................................................................7
- 2.1 Location and Size .................................................................................................. 7
2.2 Land Ownership .................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Site Description ..................................................................................................... 7
- 2.4 Constraints to Development .................................................................................. 7
2.5 Existing Land Use ................................................................................................. 8
2.6 Adjacent Land Use ................................................................................................ 8
3.0 NATURAL FEATURES ..................................................................................................9
- 3.1 Topography and Drainage .....................................................................................9
3.2 Soils and Geology .................................................................................................9
- 4.0 POLICIES AFFECTING THE PLAN ..............................................................................9
4.1 The County of Newell One Tree Road Area Structure Plan .................................9
- 4.2 The County of Newell Land Use Bylaw .............................................................10
4.3 The County of Newell Municipal Development Plan .........................................10
,.-.
- ii - August 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS continued
Page
5.0 THE PLAN .....................................................................................................................10
5.1 The Planning Area ..............................................................................................10
- 5.2 Goals and Objectives ..........................................................................................11
5.3 Design Concept and Organizing Principles ........................................................11
6.0 LAND USE .....................................................................................................................12
- 6.1 Residential Development .................................................................................... 12
6.2 Population Projections ........................................................................................ 12
6.3 Density and Statistics .......................................................................................... 13
- 6.4 Open Space/parks ............................................................................................... 13
7.0 SERVICING AND UTILI'TIES ...................................................................................... 13
7.1 Water Supplies and Distribution ......................................................................... 13
7.2 Sanitary Servicing and Wastewater Collection ................................................... 14
- ,,-~ 7.3 Stormwater Management .................................................................................... 14
7.4 Irrigation ............................................................................................................. 14
7.5 Electrical Services ............................................................................................... 15
- 7.6 Natural Gas ......................................................................................................... 15
7.7 Telephone and Cable ........................................................................................... 15
- 8.0 COMMUNI'T'Y SERVICES ............................................................................................ 15
8.1 Police Services ....................................................................................................15
.... 8.2 Fire Protection .....................................................................................................15
8.3 Emergency Medical Services ..............................................................................15
8.4 Solid Waste 5ervices ...........................................................................................16
9.0 IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN ......................................................................................16
'_ 9.1 Phasing of Development .....................................................................................16
9.2 Development Controls ........................................................................................16
10.0 REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................18
- iii -
August 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS continued
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1-Regional Context Map
Figure 2.2 -Plan Area
_ Figure 2.3 -Aerial Photograph
Figure 2.4 -Existing Land Use
Figure 2.5 -Site Constraints
- Figure 5.1-Concept Plan
Figure 5.2 -Transportation and Access
LIST OF APPENDICES
- Appendix A -Certificate of Title
Appendix B -Sanitary Servicing Report
Appendix C - EID Information
r--
-4-
August 2005
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Area Structure Plans
1.1.1 Background
Section 633 of the Municipal Government Act (MGA) provides municipalities the
opportunity to create Area Structure Plans (ASPs) "for the purpose of providing a
framework for subsequent subdivision and development of an azea of land."1 The
requirement for ASPS is cleazly defined in the County of Newell No. 4's Municipal
Development Plan and Land Use Bylaw.
ASPS provide a tool for developers and the County. The tool enables developers to
propose developments and the County to weigh the impacts. Within the ASP, both the
developer and the County can ensure the development conforms to approved policies and
guidelines for the Plan Area, including the Municipal Development Plan, Land Use
Bylaw, and Subdivision and Development Regulations, as well as other Provincial
legislation and standards. Once passed by Council, ASPs become Bylaws and are legally
binding.
1.1.2 Purpose
Pursuant to the County of Newell's Municipal Development Plan, the Deer Run Estates
ASP has been prepazed to guide the subdivision and development of the Plan Area.
The Plan will describe and/or address:
• the proposed residential land use;
• the density of population proposed for the area;
• the impacts to the surrounding land uses;
• the development capabilities of the lots;
• the constraints on the proposed developments;
• the location of proposed and existing roads and public utilities;
• the water supply and septic systems; and
• the sequence of development.
'~ ~ Municipal Government Act, Section 633 (1).
-5-
August 2005
1.2 The Approval Process
Direction for the preparation of this ASP was provided by Section 3.1.4 of the County of
Newell's MDP which requires the preparation and adoption of an ASP to provide a
-" decision making instrument for development within an area.
The Deer Run Estates (DRE) ASP will be presented to Council as a proposed Bylaw, and
_ as such, will be given three readings and a public hearing in accordance with Section 633
and Section 692 of the Municipal Government Act. The public hearing will allow
ratepayers in the County to make representation and comment.
1.3 Plan Implementation
The DRE ASP will become a County of Newell public document, after adoption as a
Bylaw, in accordance with Section 633 (1) of the Municipal Government Act. The ASP
_ does not supersede, repeal, replace, regulate, or otherwise diminish any statutory plan in
effect in the Plan Area.
_ 1.4 Plan Review and Amendment
This ASP is designed to establish short and long term growth management for the Plan
area. However, changes in the economy, social fabric and environmental conditions may
alter the sequence or relevance of the policies set forth in this ASP. It is prudent to
review this document throughout the development phase.
1.5 Interpretation
-- In this plan:
a. "Council" refers to the County of Newell Council;
b. "DRE" refers to Deer Run Estates;
c. "ASP" refers to Area Structure Plan;
d. "Plan Area" refers to Deer Run Estates Area Structure Plan area;
e. "the County" refers to the County of Newell No. 4;
f. "Land Use Amendment" refers to a change in the land use or zoning;
g. "Plan for Subdivision" refers to a detailed proposal for development of land and
forms the basis for an application for subdivision;
h. "MGA" refers to the Municipal Government Act;
i. "LUB" refers to the County of Newell's Land Use Bylaw; and
j. "MDP" refers to the County of Newell's Municipal Development Plan;
-6-
August 2005
"' 1.6 Legislative Framework
1.6.1 The Municipal Government Act
- The Alberta Municipal Government Act outlines the role of Area Structure Plans
[Section 633(2)]. ASPs are used to provide a guideline or framework for the long-term
use of the land including subsequent subdivision and development of an area of land. An
- ASP must describe the sequence of development proposed, the land uses proposed for the
area, the density of population and the general location of major transportation routes and
public utilities. In addition, it may contain any other matters that Council considers
-- necessary. The ASP provides a land use strategy for subsequent redesignation,
subdivision and development in a specific area of the Municipality.
- 1.6.2 The County of Newell -Municipal Development Plan
The County of Newell Municipal Development Plan governs the entire County. This
document outlines the policies and guidelines for land use and development and dictates
the need to prepare an ASP for the Plan Area. The key objectives are the orderly
development based on existing development boundaries and servicing, the provision of a
- range of development types, and the tying together of all development through an
integrated and comprehensive transportation network.
- ~' The County desires concentrated development patterns, rather than piecemeal
development, that do not detract from the rural nature of the community. The MDP
states that non-agricultural development is best situated in the urban fringe area. This
- ASP attempts to comply with the policies of the MDP, by locating a residential area near
the urban fringe, concentrating the development, yet adhering to Country Residential
zoning guidelines.
1.6.3 The County of Newell -Land Use Bylaw
The County of Newell Land Use Bylaw also regulates development in the study area. Its
purpose is to prohibit or regulate and control the use and development of land and
buildings within the County. The LUB should be consulted when considering
development in this Plan Area. The LUB and this ASP work in conjunction with each
other, the LUB provides detailed control regulations, which guides the development
within this A5P.
1.6.4 The County of Newell -One Tree Road Area Structure Plan
In April 2002, the County of Newel passed Bylaw No. 1379-02 for the One Tree Road
ASP. The One Tree Road ASP worked within the guidelines of the MDP and LUB, and
- encompassed the area described in the DRE ASP. As such, the One Tree Road ASP's
policies and recommendations provide additional guidance for this ASP. The goals
,--.
-7-
August 2005
stated in the One Tree Road ASP are to promote rural residential and agricultural
character.
1.6.5 Town of Brooks Planning Considerations
The Plan Area exists outside of the Town of Brooks Urban Referral Area, and therefore,
will not be referred to the Town for review and/or comment.
2.0 THE SITE
2.1 Location and Size
_ The azea described in this plan is situated adjacent to the Town of Brooks'
Urban Referral Area on the east side of Highway 1 (Trans Canada Highway) in
SW 1/a 1-19-14 W4M (see Figure 2.1). The Plan Area begins at 2.45 km east along
One Tree Road, at the point where the road heads north. It encompasses 12 proposed
- pazcels, with a total azea of 10.5156 hectares (ha) (25.9912 acres), (see Figure 2.2).
- The azea is currently designated as Country Residential in the County's LUB. The site is
located on the portion of the southwest quarter that lies between One Tree Road and the
roadway on Plan 1260 EZ.
2.2 Land Ownership
The current registered landowner of the entire subject pazcel is R. C. Baksa Stores Ltd.,
under Title No. 0471-071-634 +3.
2.3 Site Description
The Plan Area falls within the One Tree Road ASP. It is a generally flat site with little
- vegetation other than a mixture of native and introduced prairie grasses. The Plan Area is
accessible via One Tree Road and Java Lane. An existing Manufactured Home Park is
the adjacent property to the north and a three parcel Country Residential Subdivision
- exists to the northeast (See Figures 2.2 and 2.3).
2.4 Constraints to Development
Several pipelines and a wellhead exist in the area, owned by EnerPlus Resources
Corporation, TransCanada Pipelines Limited (previously Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.),
- and Celtic Exploration Ltd. All reviewed materials indicate that the pipelines contain
sweet product (no sour gas). An incorrectly installed, yet abandoned pipeline running
through the Plan Area owned by TransCanada Pipelines. A request by the landowner
"- was submitted to the pipeline owner to remove and reclaim the right-of--way. This
_ g _ August 2005
Any existing rights-of-way will be recognized and encroachment of dwellings or septic
systems into these rights-of-way will not be considered. The setbacks can be mitigated
through lot sizing and locations of housing and servicing, as shown on Figure 5.1.
Although these setbacks are AEUB recommendations, the County of Newell's LUB
(Section 54) states that the development "shall be in accordance with regulations or
directives established by the AEUB".
ATCO Gas also operates a pipeline in the area (see Figure 2.5); the minimum setback is
to the edge of the right-of--way, and septic systems are not permitted above the pipeline.
Other constraints include the roadways that bound almost the entire circumference of the
property. The setbacks from these roads include:
~°~`.~ ~'~~ ~~ ~ =Constraint
. ~~_,,. Minimum Setback (to an occupied structure)
Subdivision Streets 7.5 m
Local Roads 30 m
In addition, the Eastern Irrigation District has a canal that is adjacent to the roadway on
the east and southern portion of the Plan Area. This canal also has an active pipeline
from the canal, heading due north, that is adjacent to Proposed Lot 1 (see Figure 2.5).
The pipeline right-of-way is within the abandoned canal right-of-way. Therefore, a
dwelling is permitted to abut the abandoned canal right-of-way. An open irrigation canal
also extends in an east/west direction from the primary irrigation canal. This smaller
canal will extend through proposed Lots 4, 5, 9 and 10.
2.5 Existing Land Use
The current land use designation of the site is Country Residential, under the County of
Newell Land Use Bylaw No. 1443-03.
2.6 Adjacent Land Use
The area to the north of the Plan Area is designated Manufactured Home Park (see Figure
2.4), and the area to the northeast is designated Country Residential, with an existing
process is pending. Pipelines and wellheads require specific setbacks, according to the
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (AEUB) (March 1999):
-9-
August 2005
subdivision of three lotsZ. The area to the east of the proposed development, adjacent to
~' the irrigation canal is designated Agricultural.
3.0 NATURAL FEATURES
3.1 Topography and Drainage
- The areas in the County of Newell are divided into physiographic districts. The Plan
Area lies in the district of Matzhiwin Plain. Matzhiwin Plain is mainly comprised of
fluvial and lacustrine deposits. With elevations ranging from '700 m to 760 m, this area is
- generally lower than the surrounding lands in the County (Kjearsgaard, 1983).
- The existing drainage pattern of the area has both natural and man-made features. It is
moderately to well-drained and the surrounding landscape is undulating with slopes that
range from 2% to 3%. Much of the area drains into small canals, creeks and streams.
- Being predominantly undeveloped agricultural land, natural ponding occurs in various
spots, particularly in low-lying areas.
.... 3.2 Soils and Geology
The site is located within Soil Correlation Area #1 and the Agroclimatic zone is 3A with
- ^ moderate limitations due to drought. Kjearsgaard et al. (1983) indicates that the Plan
Area is within the Brown Soil Zone of Alberta on the Bearpaw bedrock formation
(marine origin). Soils in the area developed on either moderately fine till derived from
..- shale or moderately fine glaciolacustrine material (AGRASID, 2004). Both the till and
glaciolacustrine material range from weakly to moderately calcareous and/or saline. The
dominant soil series within the area are Tilley and Steveville. Other soil series identified
-- are: Karlsbad, Wardlow, and Halliday. These soils are naturally saline and sodic.
The Plan Area is within the Dry Mixed Grass Ecoregion, which consists of grasses and
- shrubs. Due to the irrigation canal, the soils in the subject area are considered irrigable
lands. Additional information is provided in Appendix D.
4.0 POLICIES AFFECTING THE PLAN
4.1 The County of Newell One Tree Road Area Structure Plan
The County of Newell's One Tree Road Area Structure Plan recommends residential
development in this Plan Area. Residential policy for DRE shall extend from the One
""' Tree Road ASP.
,~-
Z A dwelling is currently being constructed on one of the three lots.
- 10-
August 2005
4.2 The County of Newell Land Use Bylaw
The County of Newell's Land Use Bylaw regulates development on the subject site. The
current zoning is Country Residential (CR). The Country Residential zoning designation
"" protects the area from incompatible development. This district permits three or more lots
and their subsequent development. Each lot must be a minimum of 0.5 ha (1.2 acres) for
individual on-site servicing to a maximum of 1 ha (2.5 acres). Permitted uses include:
• accessory building (with restrictions);
- • home occupation -minor;
• single-detached dwelling;
• manufactured home (within Johnson Estates subdivisions); and
- • modular home.
In addition, the LUB specifies minimum setbacks from subdivision streets and local
-- roads, height restrictions, and maximum site coverage.
4.3 The County of Newell Municipal Development Plan
The Municipal Development Plan identifies the goals and values of the County of Newell
and provides .policies and guidelines that direct future development in a way that will
- ._.. minimize the impacts on the County. The County has identified agriculture and
agricultural production as the most important goal; this is partially achieved through the
protection of irrigation infrastructure. Other goals consist of concentrating settlements
'- and properly planning inter-municipal referral areas.
Through concentrated development, the agricultural land will be protected from sprawl,
as the proposed development area is on land already designated for residential. This
pattern of development is the most efficient and economical in terms of infrastructure,
roads and the provision of services. As well, this ASP proposes development of several
~'" lots, which decreases the amount of piecemeal development in the County.
_ The need for properly planned inter-municipal referral areas is diminished since the Plan
Area is outside of the Town of Brooks Urban Referral Area. In addition, the Plan Area is
surrounded by designated agricultural areas and is not slated for urban expansion.
Therefore, there is minimal conflict between land uses.
5.0 THE PLAN
5.1 The Planning Area
,_ The Deer Run Estates Area Structure Plan comprises the SW 1/a 1-19-14-W4M in the
County of Newell within a designated Country Residential azea. This site encompasses
,.~ one pazcel of land over 10.5156 ha (25.9912 acres).
-11-
5.2 Goals and Objectives
August 2005
The goal of this development is to plan a residential development that encompasses
9.471 ha (23.41 acres) with 10 residential lots ranging in size from 0.6 ha to 1.0 ha
.- (1.5 acres to 2.5 acres) and one or potentially two lots designated for storage facility. The
Plan meets with the. long-term policies and guidelines set out by the County of Newell.
- The Plan calls for concentrated residential development adjacent to an existing residential
neighbourhood. This is a preferred azea for development as it is already designated
Country Residential, and is located within close proximity of the Town of Brooks.
The objective of the DRE ASP is to provide a comprehensive document to guide
development in the subject azea, as well as to provide Council with both information and
- a tool to ensure that the development adheres to the plan, through passing the ASP as a
Bylaw.
Every effort has been made to mitigate the constraints of the site, especially the sweet gas
pipelines and wellhead located in and neaz the Plan Area.
` 5.3 Design Concept and Organizing Principles
The land has been subdivided to achieve lots larger than 0.6 ha (1.5 acres). The larger
` ^ lots will adhere to the policies set out in the County of Newell's Land Use Bylaw for
Country Residential, while allowing for concentrated development and providing a sense
of community.
Each house will be positioned in a location on the lot that will not impact upon the
r required setbacks for the neazby wellhead or the sweet gas, natural gas, and irrigation
pipelines. While some may view the pipelines as a constraint to development, it is truly
an opportunity to achieve an individually styled neighbourhood that is not a
W `cookie-cutter' development.
The objectives of the development include:
• ensuring the safety of all residents by mitigating traffic concerns and fulfilling oil
and gas setback requirements;
• protecting the environment through locating housing and servicing in a manner
that will minimize or negate impact on the existing irrigation canal and
-- surrounding agriculture, as well as promote natural drainage courses;
• minimize the servicing costs through efficient design and concentrated
-- development;
,--
-12-
August 2005
'^ • ensure that the development's design enriches the area, and is compatible with the
agricultural elements surrounding it; and
• ensuring that the Plan and corresponding designs adhere to the guidelines and
policies set out in the Municipal Development Plan, Land Use Bylaw, and One
Tree Road Area Structure Plan.
-- 6.0 LAND USE
6.1 Residential Development
The Plan proposes the development of 10 Country Residential lots with a lot size ranging
from 0.6 ha to 1.0 ha (1.5 acres to 2.5 acres). The County of Newell's Land Use Bylaw
permits a minimum lot size of 0.5 ha (1.2 acres), to a maximum size of 1.0 ha (2.5 acres)
for single-detached dwellings with on-site servicing in a Country Residential district.
Lots 1 and 2 will be too small and constrained for homes and therefore shall be used for
-' accessory uses, compatible with CR land use designation.
According to the One Tree Road Area Structure Plan, the area has experienced residential
"Y4 growth from Country Residential to Manufactured Home Park, as well as farmstead
dwelling. While there was concern in the OTR ASP that additional housing would result
in added concern for road safety, the planned/current construction of a new interchange at
i °'` One Tree Road and Highway 1 (Trans Canada Highway) should alleviate much of the
concerns over traffic safety. As well, the proposed residential development will only add
10 houses, which altogether should not impact the traffic significantly.
Since several pipelines also cross the property, the Plan recognizes existing rights-of--way
_ and will adhere to the recommended setbacks. Furthermore, the developer will attain a
crossing agreement before constructing the access road, and each landowner will attain a
further crossing agreement if their driveway crosses the pipeline right-of--way.
6.2 Residential Development Constraint
_. At the time of subdivision and development permit application, if lots 1 and 2 can not
accommodate a dwelling due to oil and gas pipeline right-of--ways, the concept for
country residential use on these two lots may be changed to accommodate a lighter
intensity of use such as mini-storage. A letter of consent from TransCanada Pipelines
will be required by the County at that time noting permission to place temporary storage
building(s) on site. In addition, the County may require the developer to redesignate lots
1 and 2, to Direct Control to accommodate amini-storage facility adjacent to a country
residential development.
-13-
August 2005
6.3 Population Projections
According to the 2001 census taken by Statistics Canada, the average number of people
per household in the Town of Brooks is 2.65. Therefore, upon completion, the
12 dwellings should house approximately 32 people.
6.4 Density and Statistics
The density recommendations for unserviced lots (with on-site wastewater treatment and
non-piped water) shall be 201ots per quarter section of land3. The proposed development
has 10 residential lots. Three subdivided lots and a manufactured home park already
exist on the quarter section of land; the lots are serviced by on-site septic systems and the
manufactured home park is serviced by a communal sewage lagoon. It is assumed that
the recommended density of 20 lots per quarter section of land refers to individual
wastewater systems; since the manufactured home park is serviced communally, it should
allow for increased density.
The table shown below indicates the breakdown of land uses within the Plan Area.
Area Area (acres) Percent of
(hectares) ;" Total
Country~Restdential 9.471 23.4100 90%
Proposed Subdivision Street 1.0446 2.5812 10%
Net develo able Area 9.471 23.4100. 90°l0
Total Plan Area (Gross develo able-area) 10.5156 25.9912_ 100%
Notes: Municipal and School Reserves will be provided by cash-in-lieu of land.
Should lots 1 and 2 require redesignation to Direct Control, this will change the land use
breakdown.
6.5 Open Space/Parks
As per the County of Newell's Municipal Development Plan, the option of cash in-lieu of
land will be paid to meet the requirements for Municipal and School Reserves.
7.0 SERVICING AND UTILITIES
7.1 Water Supplies and Distribution
Potable water will be supplied through Sagebrush Estates. Each home will be metered
and a monthly invoice for amount used.
' One Tree Road Area Structure Plan.
-14-
August 2005
7.2 Sanitary Servicing and Wastewater Collection
One servicing option considered for this development was to tie-in to the existing lagoon
at the Manufactured Home Park. However, after reviewing the lagoon's current capacity,
- it was deemed that until such time that the lagoon increases its capacity, it is unable to
support atie-in from the proposed development.
- As such, soil texture analyses were conducted to determine the size of fields required for
a septic system. Although the types of soil found are suitable for buried septic fields,
groundwater was found at a depth of 0.7 m. According to the Alberta Private Sewage
- Systems Standard of Practice 1999 Handbook, the point of effluent infiltration into the
soil and water table or impervious layer must not be less than 1.5 m (5 feet).
Due to the shallow groundwater, buried septic fields may not be appropriate for this area.
Other options for sanitary disposal include raised disposal fields or treatment mounds
designed for site-specific conditions or septic tanks that are regularly pumped out and
delivered to a suitable treatment facility. Full results from the soil. texture analyses are
included in Appendix C.
- The proposed subdivision is located within the standard 300-metre setback .from a
wastewater treatment facility. Only 2 lots are directly impacted by this setback and the
- treatment area is not a primary but secondary treatment pond. Subdivision approval for
the affected lots will only be granted if the County is provided with approval from the
provincial authority (Alberta Environment).
The individual lot owners will be responsible for supplying and installing a mound septic
system in compliance with the Alberta Environment's Standards and Guidelines for
- Municipal Wastewater Systems (1997) and Alberta Private Sewage System Standards of
Practice (1999).
- 7.3 Stormwater Management
Stormwater will be retained on-site to predevelopment levels. The lots will be graded so
- that any overland flow will be directed to the ditches that will be constructed parallel to
the proposed subdivision street, preventing its flow onto adjacent properties. It is
assumed that there is an existing ditch along Java Lane (to the north) adjacent to
- proposed Lot 1. Due to the relatively small size of development a Stormwater
management plan is not required. At the time of subdivision, a plan will be required
noting where the natural drainage is and that this will be at the subdivision stage.
7.4 Irrigation
The EID has been briefed on the concept for this Plan Area and are reviewing. the
conveyance of water to the site.
,--
-15-
August 2005
_..
7.5 Electrical Services
The developer will ensure that each lot has electrical services provided to it through
Utilicorp Networks Canada, or an alternative supplier (as per section 10.1 of the
One Tree Road ASP). The electricity will be supplied via an easement at the front of lots
or along overhead power lines in the utility right-of--way, as determined by the developer
- and Utilicorp Networks Canada.
7.6 Natural Gas
ATCO Gas will supply natural gas to each lot. The natural gas will be supplied via an
easement at the front of each lot.
7.7 Telephone
Telephone services will be provided for the Plan Area. Telus Communications will
provide telephone services. The services will be provided using the same utility
easement (normally 9.Sm) as the natural gas.
8.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES
8.1 Police Services
_ The RCMP detachment in the Town of Brooks will provide policing services to the Plan
Area. According to the One Tree Road ASP policy (Section 11. l ), "a special constable
shall also be available to deal with a large variety of offences, excluding criminal
matters."
8.2 Fire Protection
The Brooks Rural Fire Protection Association will manage fire protection services to the
Plan Area. Currently, the County of Newell provides funding for the Rural Association
in lieu of organizing a volunteer fire department.
8.3 Emergency Medical Services
The County of Newell is in the Palliser Health Region. The District Ambulance
Association, located in the Town of Brooks, shall provide emergency medical services to
the Plan Area. As well, there is a full-scale hospital facility and emergency ward in the
Town of Brooks. The Brooks Health Centre also has a helipad that is accessible by the
STARS Air Ambulance for transfer of patients to critical care facilities.
-16-
August 2005
8.4 Solid Waste Services
The lot owners will be responsible for the collection and disposal of solid waste within
the Plan Area. As such, the lot owners will be responsible for coordinating their solid
- waste pick-up with a contractor or by taking wastes to the regional landfill.
9.0 IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN
9.1 Phasing of Development
- The sequence of development, although quite flexible, will occur in the following phases:
Phase 1. Road Construction: The access road from Java Lane will be constructed
- first, to allow access to each lot.
Phase 2. Subdivision Planning: The final concept plan will be designed and
submitted to Council for review.
Phase 3. Property Subdivision: The property within the Plan Area will be
- subdivided into individual lots. Concurrently, the
access road (20 m width by 52.23 m length) will be
legally transferred to the County of Newell under
- ^ the Subdivision Agreement.
Phase 4. Servicing: Each lot will receive electrical, natural gas,
- telephone and cable services.
_ 9.2 Development Agreement
As a condition of subdivision, the developer will be required to enter into a development
- agreement with the County for installation of utilities, construction of roads, and other
items to be determined.
9.3 Development Controls
The development, as set forth in the DRE ASP, shall conform to the following
,_ development controls:
• The final subdivision plan and ensuing development will follow the development
- controls set forth by the County of Newell's Land Use Bylaw for Country
Residential zoning, as well as additional setbacks from the pipelines and
wellhead, according to the AEUB and the irrigation canal, according to the
- Eastern Irrigation District.
- 17 - August 2005
• The access road will be designed and constructed in accordance with the County
- of Newell's standards and will be subject to approval by the County's Public
Works Department.
- • Each lot will be serviced, via an easement, with electricity, natural gas, telephone
and cable at the developer's expense, in accordance with the standards and design
of the appropriate utility company.
• Individual lot owners will be responsible for ensuring the design and installation
_ of wastewater systems that comply with local and provincial standards. For
wastewater treatment, the lot owner will be required to hire a qualified technician
or professional to assess the suitability of the lot for a septic system (in
- accordance with oil and gas rights-of--way). The assessment must be submitted to
the Development Authority at the time of the development application.
• The developer, in accordance with the County of Newell's numbering policy,
shall provide the lot numbering system.
- • The landowner has requested the road plan #1260EZ which is 20.12 m be
cancelled and returned to the title. The existing road along the Bantry Canal is
outside the Plan Area. Neither the County nor the EID have use for this road plan
- ,_._ presently.
-18-
August 2005
10.0 REFERENCES
Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. 2004. Agrasid Database.
www. l . agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/alUsag3254?opendocument.
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board. Minimum Setback Recommendations. An
Overview. March, 1999. Retrieved May 3, 2005 from
_ www.eub.gov.ab.ca/BBS/requirements/gbs/arch/gb99-04.htm.
Eastern Irrigation District. Annroved Practices and Guidelines Governing Water
Delivery and Water Management Operations. 2002.
_ Kjearsgaard, A.A. et al. Soil Survey of the County of Newell, Alberta. Research Branch
Agriculture Canada, Alberta Soil Survey Report No. 41, 1983.
VIII
- rP„ _-
/__. sl
,~r~._~... _
/~ _
f 6 yf~~ y
_ _
rr. - ~ a
.ew
F T t r
l.. .. .~.~. ... s. .~+5 .; ._ 1
._ 1 _~_ I..__ - p ......_ ._,.
w
.,•
_ Ir..~. - - - o
1~
'' • .. .~
1 ~ •~ N~M~s1. -
i..~. .. ~_. I .. _. . __•..1 1
• .. a.. _ -
. . ~.I.. -...~ •- ~. ....... y.l. ~•.
~ _
yi I t ~ 0`
.w .
...
.. .._.
1 a ~
. ~~- 1 tt' ~ ~VO 1 1
r
w. .l. I i j F . _. i.' - _.
L l.+r -
~ F 1 7 { - .:
t ~_~ t T __ ..I T Y .i,._
'. t* ' _
.~~ ~ r
~ I ~~a i ~ -: +r- 7 - -~ 1t 1 rr ~
.+ 1 7,.. P ~~-
CLIENT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CORY BAKSA ~-~ EBA En ineerin Consultants Ltd.
DEER RUN ESTATES AREA STRUCTURE PLAN ~ 9 9
PORTION OF SW 1 4 SEC 1 TWP 19 RGE 14 W4M
SCALE/EBA PROJECT N0. DATE/DRAWN BY: TITLE/EBA DRAWING N0.
NTS 05/05/03 REGIONAL CONTEXT MAP
9600249 CDK/JSR FIGURE 2.1
~.:.
„~~.
J
+~
G
V
G
L
G
W
m
W
M
~ pN
S
1n ~O
O 01
Y
O
U
0
Z
~ < N
c ~ N
p<q LJ
C ~
~a~
~J
u~
~i
0
~ ~
~ o
•.~
a
u>
0
0
CJ
C
(~
~_
C
L
~ V
3
a ~,.
W
~' WU'
U ~
N N
m ~ U
} yy N
~ W \
U < ~-
W ~
Z ~`
O
i ~ Z
F
~ o
3 W ~
f ~ d
N
N
U
C7
t~~
b..5 i'f,j1~~ ~,
I 'i ..
it
II I~
y
II ~f
~,,,,
t 1!
- _ _- - _ ~
- ---- ~ ~~; 1 ~4 ;
1 1 i
~ . - .:,
a
.:. ~ ~~
t ..<.
.. .. ~ •r
1.
}
{ 4
~.' w'~ e
•,
s~1y t ~ ' ,
91 ~-e.at t ,~y
I ti ~y d ~ ~ V F ~~ ~.
` tl .d' ~.']!W F ~~' µ 1 6rq„~j,~ A ~y~ .~. rtl~';
v ~ _„#~ y~ L~ _
p ~ t
' ~„~, { ~' ~- ~ r d y~ ~d~ ~
T 1.~ '~ R~• fic ice. 'R ~~~ Y14- y $ J` * 'r
V ~z~. ~ ~~" },~ ~~'31 r:x ur
_ ~.,
a f:~ ~ of
f -' ~ ~~?~.~6'~ iii ,,t ~ _ . - -- --
...
,_ I t~ ~r>a~~l
q~ r
.,;~ _ ~ ~
n, . .,'fir. ° ~ , ~f i~~~ T is
a A6' I
,e,a.
.: y
~` f ! ~'~~ .~ ' r
<~ r.
_„ o
~~ 1: r„, ~ L ~~ I ~ f 2~
~ r~ ~~~_ ~ ~ °~~ e ~ ~ i
~~ ~ , t ~~ ~ ,~ ~ °,~ k.
"t~;~ ' ~ii ~ ~ .~ I , ' ~ I
~ ~~ ~ t ''-
'~ w; l ~r iv 3 d a 3+"d
{
f~ E ~~ ~ } }
s ,~ ~: Yr ,
~ I ~ ~
I
''II 'fir: ^k `$.:.. ~ .
I.~ ~ f
L ~~y* z ~ I '.y /
~ ri 4K
Y I I ;v'[~,v~i ~.~
y
f
~r4~~
~w ~,
t I
~~'
l {
~,~~
« •~
~` S a~ I
P
17~ ' ~
I ~ 9
1 "
` a
" IE t ~'"
l ~
~
{ ~
~
' ~ ~ Y ~i
~
,t
~~
~
1 k -a c
++~~p6'
~ -.t' FYI ~„ _
i w~
. p
.
~J ~4uj~y
{ Ika:_
a ~
~ :
IQ
~ r'.
~~ 1
~ ~~ ~ I
f4
,
k
~$~,
~~`,tyg ~
k
f F~ J
.~
~~ ~ ~
~
~y f ~~y7~~ d3 ~jF ,
54""' k ~.: t
`d,. rr ~ 1
-~\ y 7 ~ i rl~ ~'l~ pj~ ~ ~~ ax .~,~ AP '
''
~ ~
~
yw ~
~ t ~ ~
+ ~~
f ~ a
~~~i~~ IF ~~ ~° ~
SR" .~ f
`
'~r
-"""t
;w ~. A
~~~ F
I ~ ~t
Tim.,
;
, v
.
a,
~,~ .,#~ ~ fin`. '
I ; ~
~ t.+
x
.," « "fit
t y
~ ~ ~
_ `
h~~~{~d,x~~ f ~
(~,
l '
,,
r ,~
' ~ 4t
ii"a,7er.s• p W .~ .fit ~^ ~ ~ •
~ TM .F
'
+
~ .';
{
I~
~,
-
~ a ~
r' e , f t
". ~ ~_
~ o
- OC ',d
~ ~:4 " a ~'~~
_ { 1, y
1 ~ k J f+
~~i.CaE'l ~
~~~ ~. ~ ~ '
'
a"Tr4r.r1R~ a"^ j, 7, = r [s T a
~
'$ "k P X. tk i ~,~F~~ it 1 ~'~ ~ ,~~ A. ,j`r
~~r
~ t r',i '~i.1 ~+ /:
~ i'!i,,`'~,~ 5J'
tYrs.,k ^i~e `,-
is sy. ~ -tit M,
uu~~
.M'
,y~ ~~
~~
~`~^JrtIA
55~
" t
~ 'I ~ k.ci~"'~~,
f F ~„'dy
F' '5 Y> ~
k ~.~`/ O11~t![Rf /.rj ~'t
r
t,
'
v ,,;
I
t. ..
: ..
~t '
M; i'
T r: r ~i7 ~
v ~• .-n
,.r~t~i
.
J
+y
C
+~
y
C
O
V
C
.~
C =
C O
W Z c~
Q Z
O
W oaN
J W
m ~~
w ~
H
i LO
J
~ M
_ \~ O
v p p ~
V \ Q
~ O O)
N
t Q
n o
~ O
J O
~ ~
N
~ ~
Y
~ ~U vvi
~_
4 11
'i)
~J
`I~
6
Z
5 ~
~
a Ln
N
O
Z G
=
Z
d ~
~ ~t
~
~ ,
~
W
~
~ ~~;
~i
~
~ ~
~
rn
(C
Q ^ ~~l
Y VI
N ~
~
.~
->
w ~-
0
m Q ~
~ r~~
O ~ G,
~
(/~
W
N N
o
Z
~ ~`
O
G
F Z
O u:
o
~
W ~
~ ~~
~ ~ ~ c~
w
~ .-
J
w
C
+~
y
C
O
U
c
as
as
c
W
m
w
? M
~ \ d0-
~ O N
i \O
i O O
IN
o=
Zo
~Z
~g~
a
~ N
o (.7
Z W
wN~
~ X ~
F W L~
i ~
i ~
_; \
Y
c ~
~ U
Q
W
Q
Q
a
J
J Q
F
Y F W
z
~ o
a o in
w
w w ~
o ~ ~
x ~ ~ ._
~ z
Z O J
U
O ~
U O M,
~ ~ N
Z Z O ~~,
F F d iC'~
fn N O -7
W w ~ , ~~'
.j
~, p
~~
c
U
Z ~ G~
a ~ ~
W ~ ~°)
W nl
~ hl
U ~ ~,
Q ~ d
Y N ~
(n ~
Q w
~- Q cwn
O ~`' ~
U ~
W ~
Z ~
~ O
~ z
~ ~
W '-
w ~
o °
a.
N.W. 1/4 Sec.1-19-14 W4M. I i ; I , /'~ ~
-- - ~ ~~
ii _
-- - i ~ ~ l ,---- Sr.. --- i~~J
I /
i ', I
~ ~.
jl, ~
1 i i
S.W. 1/4 Sec.1-19-14 W4M. ~ ' ~ ~~
li
~ i
~~ ~ !i
it' , ~ A
JAVA LANE o '~------__.__
i Q ~ 20.t
2m ROgp
~ ~~~~ ~ FLAN 1260 FZ
w
w 06-01
n
s
I ~ `-------_ ~-~-~_ _
`'~-
~ / c
LEGEND: ~ -__
I ~ j rj ~.,~ ~ WELL HEAD
N ~ ~` ~ - - -- - - NATURAL GAS PIPELINE RIGHTIOF WAY
/ ~ ( ~ / ~%` ` ii - cns -- cns - ATCO GAS LINE, APPROX. LOCATION
o ~
- ~~ ~ ~ ~~,~ ® NATURAL GAS PIPELINE RIGHT OF WAY
~ ~ ~..,~ WITHIN PROPOSED LOTS
_ _
_ 20.12m GOVERNMENT ROAD ALLOWANCE (CORRECTION LINE
/ i ` ~ N.W. 1 /4 Sec.35 ,1~1 - 14 W.4M.
0 50 100 150 200 250m ~
1:5000
... CLJENT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CORY BAKSA
,,.., DEER RUN ESTATES AREA STi~UCTURE PLAN EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.
PORTION OF SW 1 4 SEC 1 TWP 19 RGE 14 W4M
"" SCALE/EBA PROJECT N0. ATE/DRAWN BY: TITtE/EBA DRAMANG N0.
AS SHOWN 05/05/03 SITE CONSTRAINTS
9600249 CDK/JSR FlGURE 2.5
G: \0906\9600249\DWG\9600249 Fig 2.5.dwa, dhnidcn, 2G05/06/03-09: 45
N.W. 1/4 Sec.1-19-14 W4M. I f I ~ j
f
-------- _ I ~' ~
~~ n
j '~ r;
~ ;~ ~ ~ ,/,
S.W. 1/4 Sec.1-19-14 W4M.
E
~ LOT 12
_ Q __-
0.881Ho
!I w
i W
LOT 11
0.900Ho
(2.22ac)
I!
/~,
b
i L
T
j"
5
0
-
.._
-LL ~
.
U2
,
"-- ;
®LOT 5
, 0.77+
; I I Lsla<
LOT
~ 0.608Ho
(1.50ac)
LOT 7
.606Ha ~
I.50~
~`
J
2
' LOT B
0.672Ha
4
5
i ~
!%~i
~ /
S`J:1 ~5'ti': -~---_ -
'r
~/~/-, .-.. GAS __..... G _-.
q
~~
~ ~ -- ~
._._
m ~ -_-___ ~
~ ?Q l y~ ROAD pUN
!' 1260
~ ~
~06-01 /
r / / /
s
LEGEND:
WELL HEAD
- ~ - - - - NATURAL GAS PIPELINE RIGHT OF WAY
crs axe - ATCO GAS LINE, APPROX. LOCATION
~" ® PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE
(APPROX 15M2)
___~ ~ ,4
_ 20.12m GOVERNMENT ROAD ALLOWANCE CORRECTION LINEZ
N.W. 1/4 Sec.35 -,~ti1~ - 14 W.4M.
0 50 100 150 200 250m
1:5000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ENT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CORY BAKSA
,,.-, DEER RUN ESTATES AREA STRUCTURE PLAN EBA Englneering Consultants Ltd.
PORTION OF SW 1 4 SEC 1 TWP 19 RGE 14 W4M
SCALE/EBA PROJECT N0. ATE/DRAWN BY: TITLE/EBA DRAWING N0.
AS SHOWN 05/05/03 CONCEPT PLAN
9600249 CDK/JSR FlGURE 5.1
G: \0906\9600249\DWG\9600249 Fig 2.S.dwg, dhnici~r~, 2005/06/03-09: 48
r---- -
N.W. 1/4 Sec.1-19-14 W4M. I ~
-------- -~-!' ~ ~ j
~- - ..
~ an - ---
~ ,
;I ~i ~ ~
~ ' ~ ~
i
~ ~
~ ~ ;~ ~ i
S.W. 1/4 Sec.1-19-14 W4M. ~ jf ~ ~ ~ rt /
E
JAVA
0
O
--------
--
w
w
~
Z
O
®.~i -' f
'~ ' ~~
i
=
~ _
/ ~-
J
® J
I
~;
1/
eHs ----
a
% ~ L-- . --
'C~ l ~ ~/
I -~06-01 / ~ ~~lG
t"--- '-
~I -----______
k
c
/` /
' ~
'
- _ ~/
-,._ ~
`~ ~' LEGEND: I
` ~y ~~~ i ~ WELL HEAD
/~ ~~, - - - - - NATURAL GAS PIPELINE RIGHTIOF WAY
/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - cns -- ~a- ~- ATCO GAS LINE, APPROK. LOCATION
' ~ `~~ ~5~ PROPOSED BUIU)ING ENVELOP
/ ~ ~ ~~ (APPROX 15M2)
N PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
~', """" PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ROAD
•avvvv
TRAFFIC FLOW ARROWS
20.12m GOVERNMENT ROAD ALLOWANCE CORRECTION UN~
N.W. 1 /4 Sec.35 `1 - 14 W.4M.
0 50 100 150 200 250m
1:5000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
UENT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CORY BAKSA
,..., DEER RUN ESTATES AREA STRUCTURE PLAN EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.
PORTION OF SW 1 4 SEC 1 TWP 19 RGE 14 W4M
SCALE/EBA PROJECT NO. ATE/DRAWN BY. TITLE/EBA DRAWING N0.
AS SHOWN 05/05/03 TRANSPORTATION AND ACCESS
9600249 CDK/JSR FlGURE 5.2
G: \0906~•~9600249\DWG\9600249 Fig 2.5.dwg, dhnidan, 2005/06/03-09:49
i
;-
i
~ i
r__
APPENDIX A
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
_~
1~
ALBERTA REGISTRIES
LAND TITLE CERTIFICATE
S
LINC SHORT LEGAL
0022 580 311 4;14;19;1;NW
0030 356 414 4;14;19;1;SW
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FIRST
MERIDIAN 4 RANGE 14 TOWNSHIP 19
SECTION 1
THE SOUTH HALVES OF LEGAL SUBDIVISIONS 11
AND 12 IN THE NORTH WEST QUARTER
'- CONTAINING 16.2 HECTARES (40 ACRES) MORE OR LESS
EXCEPTING
PLAN NUMBER HECTARES ACRES
_ ROAD WIDENING 8211090 0.104 0.257 (LSD 12)
EXCEPTING THEREOUT ALL MINES AND MINERALS
SECOND
MERIDIAN 4 RANGE 14 TOWNSHIP 19
SECTION 1
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH WEST QUARTER
WHICH LIES TO THE NORTH AND WEST OF THE
ROADWAY ON PLAN 1260EZ
CONTAINING 37.136 HECTARES (91.83 ACRES) MORE OR LESS
EXCEPTING:
PLAN NUMBER HECTARES ACRES
_ ROAD WIDENING 8211090 0.417 1.030
SUBDIVISION 0410571 4.97 12.28
EXCEPTING THEREOUT ALL MINES AND MINERALS
ESTATE: FEE SIMPLE
MUNICIPALITY: COUNTY OF NEWELL N0. 4
REFERENCE NUMBER: 961 114 643
( CONTINUED )
TITLE NUMBER
041 071 634 +3
'- PAGE 2
.-~ # 041 071 634 +3
- ------=----- --------------------------------------------------------------------
REGISTERED OWNER(S)
REGISTRATION
------------ DATE(DMY)
-------------- DOCUMENT TYPE VALUE CONSIDERATION
------------------------------------------------------
041 071 634 23/02/2004 SUBDIVISION PLAN
- OWNERS
R.C. BAKSA STORES LTD..
- OF BOX 872
BROOKS
ALBERTA T1R 1B7
------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------
ENCUMBRANCES, LIENS & INTERESTS
REGISTRATION
NUMBER DATE (D/M/Y) PARTICULARS
573FR RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
2688HW 19/01/1960 PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ORDER
_
-- IN FAVOUR OF - THE ALBERTA GAS TRUNK LINE CO LTD.
AFFECTED LAND: 4;14;19;1;NW
4;14;19;1;SW
- AFFECTED PLAN: 7817HL
"ORDER 24286 - 60 FT STRIP"
51022A 13/10/1960 MORTGAGE OF UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
'- MORTGAGEE - MONTREAL TRUST COMPANY.
AFFECTS INSTRUMENT: 2688HW
- 5108IA 13/10/1960 MORTGAGE OF UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
MORTGAGEE - THE ROYAL TRUST COMPANY.
AFFECTS INSTRUMENT: 2688HW
- 731 075 320 23/11/1973 CAVEAT
CAVEATOR - ENERPLUS RESOURCES CORPORATION.
1900, 700-9TH AVE SW
.- CALGARY
ALBERTA T2P3V4
( CONTINUED )
ENCUMBRANCES, LIENS & INTERESTS
r^^ PAGE 3
REGISTRATION # 041 071 634 +3
NUMBER DATE (D/M/Y) PARTICULARS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFFECTED LAND: 4;14;19;1; SW
_ "PTN"
(DATA UPDATED BY: TRANSFER OF CAVEAT
961045663)
,_ (DATA UPDATED BY: CHANGE OF ADDRESS 971011391)
741 100 000 29/10/1974 IRRIGATION ORDER/NOTICE
THIS PROPERTY IS INCLUDED IN THE EASTERN
IRRIGATION DISTRICT
801 019 086 07/02/1980 UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
GRANTEE - FORTISALBERTA INC..
320 - 17 AVENUE S.W.
CALGARY
ALBERTA T2S2Y1
"PTN DESCRIBED IN INST"
(DATA UPDATED BY: TRANSFER OF UTILITY RIGHT
OF WAY 001283970)
~. (DATA UPDATED BY: CHANGE OF NAME 051013656)
811 113 395 16/06/1981 CAVEAT
CAVEATOR - ARIES RESOURCES LTD.
821 204 136 29/11/1982 UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
GRANTEE - CELTIC EXPLORATION LTD..
500, 505-3 ST SW
CALGARY
ALBERTA T2P3E6
"DISC EXCEPT R/W ON PLAN 8311343-831233916, 29 12
1983"
(DATA UPDATED BY: TRANSFER OF UTILITY RIGHT
OF WAY 031156865)
971 123 853 05/05/1997 UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
GRANTEE - CANADIAN WESTERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
LIMITED.
981 085 314 24/03/1998 UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
GRANTEE - THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EASTERN
IRRIGATION DISTRICT.
011 073 451 20/03/2001 DISCHARGE OF UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY 981085314
PARTIAL
EXCEPT PLAN/PORTION: 9911714
031 068 528 28/02/2003 UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY
GRANTEE - NOVA GAS TRANSMISS:
;5
r
,~ '
( CONTINUED )
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENCUMBRANCES, LIENS & INTERESTS
~"` PAGE 4
REGISTRATION # 041 071 634 +3
NUMBER DATE (D/M/Y) PARTICULARS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AS TO PORTION OR PLAN:9811622
'- TAKES PRIORITY OF CAVEAT 971302837
REGISTERED ON OCTOBER 9, 1997
- 041 071 633 23/02/2004 CAVEAT
RE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL
GOVERNMENT ACT
CAVEP:TOR - THE COUNTY OF NEWELL NO. 4.
- P.O. BOX 130
BROOKS
ALBERTA T1R1B2
TOTAL INSTRUMENTS: 014
THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES CERTIFIES THIS TO BE AN ACCURATE
REPRODUCTION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE REPRESENTED
HEREIN THIS 17 DAY OF MARCH, 2005 AT 09:49 A.M.
ORDER NUMBER:2336615
CUSTOMER FILE NUMBER:
~-
*END OF CERTIFICATE*
THIS ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED LAND TITLES PRODUCT IS INTENDED FOR THE
SOLE USE OF THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER, AND NONE OTHER, SUBJECT TO WHAT IS
SET OUT IN THE PARAGRAPH BELOW.
- THE ABOVE PROVISIONS DO NOT PROHIBIT THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER FROM
INCLUDING THIS UNMODIFIED PRODUCT IN ANY REPORT, OPINION, APPRAISAL OR
OTHER ADVICE PREPARED BY THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER AS PART OF THE ORIGINAL
PURCHASER APPLYING PROFESSIONAL, CONSULTING OR TECHNICAL EXPERTISE FOR
- THE BENEFIT OF CLIENT(S).
APPENDIX B
SANITARY SERVICING REPORT
,--
..
_~
,~
h
~~. ' ~ ~- EN'V~~R~JTECH SEi~r1/1~ES:
E ~ ~ R.A. (Rays luska
427 - i5t Street UVest ~ Chemical TeGhnolo~(st' Phan~e/F~x. 3b2.265y
Brooks. Alberta Certl~ed ErWironmental Spec}a(}st• Cellular•3b2.9567
T1 R OGl CerCfied 1=nwronmental Site /lssessor'• Emalk eNvi~ayfptelus.net
ay
Mr. Randy l3aksa
sagebrush Estates
County of Newell .No. A, Alberta
PROJECT: SING SI~PYIC DISPOSAL F1ELD$ BY SOIL. TEXTURAL. TRIAN~L.~ .
1.0 IN*PRODUCTION
The. "Alberta Private Sewage Systems Standard of Practice 1999 Handbook" allows two
methods of determining sizing'of fields for septic systems. One is by an in situ percolation
test and the oiler is by~soil texture. Qri Apn'123, 2005 eleven testltioles vaere dn'lled on the
subject property and soil. sannpies vrere collected for soil te~dure analyses. .
2.0 ME'rHODOL.OGY (Ses A#tached Figure)
Deeper #estholes had already~been drilled throughout the investigation aces and had•been
allovued•to stabilize. Eleven additional tastholos wale drilled with most,in the vioinity'of
existing boreholet~. 7tle~ ne~wtestholes wane dn`iled to a deplh of 36" wit'F- sample collection
from 1$-36". At tide same tame the existing boreholes~Mere inspected and i~KU1y, groundwater
depth was measured using a Heron sonic interface probe. 't'he soil samples ware them
transported to Lakeside ReseatnCh for moisture and te~duwrel analysos.
3.0 OBSERVATIONS (TABLE 1)
So-tls from the surFac;e to the sampling depth were similar overall, a ooatrser grained sandy
sift. •• From 18.36" moisture increased with depth end soils became finer grained with in
some cases a day tiN encotxttered with coal, salts and/or oxides. • Norte of the. current •
testholes envountered the coal andweather~ed.shalehoundinea~ertes#holes to tl~ north
(Mi'. 8aksa had observed this material at depth in one of the:earlier.boreholes) .
Groundwater was measured to as near as O.7m belowsurface- The standard of practice
item 7.1.6. requires that~the "vertical ~se~ratian between the point of effluent 'infiltration
into the soil and s water table or an impervious layer of not less than (a)1500mm (~5 ft:}
In a disposal field with efilluerrt fr~r a septic tank and ~ other tr+slatme~li". The
groundwater depth may vary seaaonairy and in response to water levels in the ngarby
irrigation canal and at times may be ,shallower ar deeper.
_ ~ ENVlRUTECH ~ Page 1
. ~,-~.ssgsr~Hr,~ssoa~-noN a~nciunoN
ASSOCIATED ~VIRONAABiTAI SAE'1155~ ~ ~~~
Z0 39tid S3~1SCS~itiHS~l bEE8E6LE0b ZT ~Z0 966IlLZ/L0
- I~
'i
.i
i
i
4.g Ct7NCLUSICyNS .
The subject parse! soils would be suitable for burled septic fields except for the shallow
groundwater encountered in most of~the.earlier boreholes. If an impermeable layer'is'
encountered as frAr. i3aksa indicated vsss the case in one or fvw of the ~ watertable ,
bgrehoies and it is within 1.5m ~of the surface this would also be a factor Raised disposal
fields or treatment mounds designed for site specific conditions may be the best disposal
option. ~ Fields should be sized conservatively according to the "Standard of Practice"
g~iidelines and the testhole soil particle size analyses. fihe plumbing can#racitor should be
able to apply the results and expected loading per residence to design appropriate .
systems.
If you have;any comments or Concerns or require additional information give me a calf at
(403) 362.2651 or on Dell at (403) 3s2a5s7. Thank you. ~ .
Sincerely,
R. A (Ray) Juska CT, CESA, CE$
per Envirotech Serrricea
ENVIRQTECH
E0 3~Jbd
532~1St/SM~S~21
Page 2 .
bEE8E6LE0b Zi~ZO 966T/LZ/L0
.:: ...
f
f , ~ <~~>>~yrf~f
~
/ '~'
~~
~~ /~
f
;
;
ice;}~~/ ~~~
r
'~>,:. '~~}~~~
:;f>~
>~~;:..~
::.>
~; <
'~>
f ~.. ~~
...
~~~ ~ ''~ ..
~.
~~
.,
„~ ~~
~~.
/~
f~;:
~' ~~::
~ ~~
f
f
~ .
,~.
.,rrf;
~~
:~: ..
'~~<,
...,
,.
>:~:
.:... :.:f.: ... ..: .:;.;...
;, :.
,-, ~ ~ o
- =~o
W
W y~ ~
r a
J
°o~N
Nab
.r Ny~~li
JW~
-^ a~•1 W
H b
~~{~1~
+7~ ~ W
J
~r°na
~ W
~~a
_ ~n~a
Nf W
Q~4
~~ ~~Z
a~~
r. bra
~~o
o '~ ~
~a~
~~
N
~.. ~~~~
~ ~ ~C
~~b
~~0000
~- dg~~
OC =
~~~~
~ 4 ~ ~
TGWU
~ H U
~° ~~
~~~
.~
W
~~
vs,
~
~m
~
~
a-
~~ .
~
m
a
Wp ca o ao c o w Qo n,~.. ° Q a
g 0 ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ]M~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d
Q
N
ti
~y
~~
p 1~
ti
lh
r
P+
ti
O
~ ~
O ti
ti
~
ti
~
~
~ a
o
~
N ~ ~- ~- ~ r ~ ~ r
(~
~ ~
~ 'UUJ
N ~
U "v~
~ J "'i
~ ~
U U J N V
} ~ N ~ N M N ~ N N N N
x
J
~ ~y
N
[~~f
N
N p
C~
N
l'~7
N
t~"
l~~i
OC
~
~
~~o,
~
~
ti
O
~~ ~ ~ EE
~i, E
- E
~ ~
~ ~-.
~ ~
f- r
o
•' ~
H g
~ W
d ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g
p
O
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Y
h
m
50 3Jdd S3ZIOlStISJidH~21 bEE8E6LE0b ZS~ZO 9662/LZ/L0
Alberta Private SB
Standard of Practice
tb the hydraulic oonductAdtY or the soq or Nie
rste that the soa wul wept watB-• . 77re results
of N,ls rest provide some zY'~~ ~.~'°"".
Other crtterrm wa also n ~ ~d~.
when sln~ a system,
sou texture, type oI day. seasonal -,igh wate-
table and water quaNry, for axarrtple: Sootynn
Adsorp6ol- Ratio.
7.1.5. A subsurface effluent disposal system, or
other systems that use the absorptbn of effluent into
the soil ftyr treatment and disposal, shall absorb the
e~uent into the soil at a rate of
(a) not faster than 5 minutes per 25 mm
(1 in.) as determined by a percolation
test using water or, 5 Litres per
square metre par minute. and
(b) not slower than t30 minutes per 25
mm (1 in.) as determined by a
percolation test using water or, 0.042
litres per square metre per minute.
Standard of Practice -19!79 Handbook
Explanation
Gram or Part/c/e Siza Analysis means a standard
sand silt orrday partkk;<f es in ai~soil s m~entage of
See Pa 121 Particle or Grain Size Analysis Test in
Appendix `B"
Sails that allow the effluent to move through it quickly
do real properly treat the effluent. Conversely soils
that do not allow the effluent th easily move through it
will .soon plug up as it is ditflcuR to treat the organic
content in the sewage which then plugs the soil.
See Pa 65 Amide 10.2.2 in the Standard of Practice.
See pa. 94 A 6 Percolation Test Proeed~ in
Appendix `A"
See Pq 114 Percolation Test In Appendix "B"
See Pa 181 Fig Q~ in APi'~dix "B'
See Pa. 133 Location of_Disuose Fi in Appendix
~6"
gee Pa i47 Treatment_Mound$ in Appendix "B'
7.1.6. A subsurface eA7uent disposal system, or
other systems that use the absorption of effluent into
the soil for treatment and disposaa, shall maintain a
vertical separation between the point of etlluent
infiltration into the soil and a water table ar an
impervious layer of not less than
(a) 1500 mm (5 ft.) in a disposal system
supplied with effluent from a septic
tank arxi no other treatment, or
(b) 900 mm (3 ft.) ~
(i) a dispose! field supplied with
efJ'kaent from a Class 1
packaged sewage treatment
plant ar a sand filter,
(ii) a treatment mound, or
(iii) an open bottom sand filter.
intent: Depe++dt--D an the bvisl or 1rNrlal or prarrary
tmatrnera4 t-re eflNrent must travel a
oprypspondGrp distarwe the sort to
complete treatment
Vertical SeparatJon means the depth of unsaturated
soil between the bottom of an Q1l9uent disposal
component and the highest seasonal water fable.
The effluent must travel through a distance of
unsaturated soft to complete treatment. Treatment
does not occur in saturated soil.
Where nitrate and or phosphate Pollution is a concern
because of shallow unconfined aquifers, additional
separation or further treatment prior to the effluent
entering the soil may be required to meet the
requirements of amide 1.2.1
See P . 39 1
See Pa. a5. Article.71~2.1
See Pa fl3 Article 8.2.1.(1)
$ee Pa 59 Article 8.2.1
Seel';; 59. Art~le 9.2.2
See Pa. 65. Article 1l).2.1
g~ ~-n Vertical Seoaratio~ in Appendix "B"
See P .136 iced Dis Fi s in Appendix "B"
:SYSTEMS STrwoN~G OF PF
Fe1ST EDn10N JULY, 20t]0
Page 38
t
t
4
90 3JCd 532101SGS~1tifiO?_I bEE8E6LE0b ZZ ~Z0 9661/LZ/L0
Alberta Private s6
Standard of F~ractice
7A.'1.5. When using the results of a soil texture
classification to size a system, the disposal fled
weeping lateral trench bottom area shall be sized
so that the efAue~t loading rate per day for soil
cfassffications determined in Table 7A.1.5.A. does
not exceed, in a soil classified as:
(a) Clay, not suitable without further
testing,
(b) Silty Clsy, not suitable without
further testing,
(c) Silty Clay loam, not suitable
without further testing,
(d} Sandy Ciay, not suitable
without further testing,
(s) Clay Loam, 10.78 L per square
metre {0.22 gal per aq. ft.),
(t) Silt, 12.25 L per square
metre (0.25 gal per sq. ft.),
(g) Sandy Clay Loam, 13.72 L per
square metre (0.28 gal per sq. ft.),
(h) Silt Loam, 18.72 L per
square metre (0.2$ gal per sq. ft.),
(f) Loam, 17.9 5 L per
square metre (0.35 gal per sq. ft.),
U) Sandy Loam, 22.05 L per
square metre (0.45 gal per sq. R),
{k) loamy Sand. 30.87 l per
square metre (0.63 gal per sq. ft.),
and
(1) Send, not suitable
without further testing.
Standard of Practice - 7999 Handbook
trxptanstion
1nNnt s~'Olts classed as nOt aulta6Jc N~tnout flufller
testirly lbr a dsposd rrald !n ars taAk may
new an liNNbatlon refs that wlll accorrlrnodats
a disposal veld. flsglgr hstinD aarCn as e
percolatlorl tam soA 86uCtUre, end detc-'FnWnD
tho absence d exparx>ebls days may
the s4i! can eooorFrnodate a dlrposal tiara.
See~a 37 Article-7.1.4
See P . 17 Fi 7 Q, Soil Texture
Classificatlon Triangle in Appendix "e"
S~ .121 Pa 'de Grain i e Anai si T tin
Appendix -6"
gee .129 Si 'n the Dis I Fleid Tr ch o
Ar'~a in Appendix "13"
See Pg. 140 Sizino t Infiltration Area in Appendix
"B.
To use these loading rates, divide the vdume of
sewage per day by the g~'n loading rate. (Gallons
• per day divided b'y the gallon per sq. it. bading rate
for the soA texture.)
lxampie of sizing using soil texture bading
rates:
4 bedroom house Silt Loam soil.
Example: imperial measures
450 gals per day
loading rate for silt foam = .28 gals. per aq. ft.
450 + 0.28 = 1607.14 sq. ft.
1607.14 sq. ft. of trench bottom area is required for
the tour bedroom home on silt loam soil.
If 2 foot wide trenches are used 803.6 lineal ft. of
disposal field trench is required.
Example: metric measures
2040 litres per day
loading rate for sift foam ~ .13.72 L per aq. m.
2040 + 13.72 ~ 14$.69 sq. meters
148.68 sq. meters of trench bottom area is required
for the four bedroom home on sIR loam soil.
.,/
~~ .
PRNATE 3EwA<3E S'rs~'MS 8TAFIW--rD OF PF
FIRST EPrn4N JIRY, 2000
Page 42
L0 3Jtid S3ZIO1StiSM7S~~l bEE8E6LE0b ZZ:ZO 966T/LZ/L0
•~ ,
,..~
,~-~
Alberta Prrvate Sewage Systems Standard of Practice -1989 Handbook
Standard of Practice Explanaiivn
Figure TA.1.5.A. Soil Texture Soll Texture C1asslfrcation means a classification of
soil set out in Table 7A.1.5 having a soil composition
Ciassificatign Triangle determined by Grath or Particle Slze A»a/ysls using
a standard hydrometer method of establishing
percentage of sand, silt or day particles in a soil
,°° sample.
Grain or Particle Sixe Analysis means a standard
.o ----~--- hydrometer method of estabf~ahing percenbge of
„";~'' ~ sand, sit or day partides In a soil sample.
Soil Texture
• The results of a Grain or Partide Size analysis will
p
" ; .. ; Ciassiflcation
~ Triangle
provide the percentages of Sand, Silt and Clay in the
see --- - - -=- ,-
-Cis
'
, soil sample.
~
• ~ • ' ~ "
°j'
N
~Ger
~.,,
CIer;L.r~.~
; ~
,
:;
_ ; To use the table:
1. Apply the percentages of Sand to the bottom of
~ -
_-- --- :----
-- ---
• ~ w~car : and draw a vertical line up through
7A
1
T
A
bl
5
~ .
.
.
.
e
a
~• ----~----~--- ' ._:~...:
~~ ~ L9"` ~ ~- the table,
2. Apply the percentages of Clay to the left side of
+o --- ' ----•----,~... -• ;-•-•;-•-~ -~-- Table 7A.1.5.A. and draw a horizontal Ilse across the
so< ''"p"'.",i' table.
0 10 20 70 b ee N 'n a0 N tao
r.roenuo. s.~a
Note: >tr the peresnta~e d sand and day
lxnv/dsa the wnefielrq Peroenlese atsiAt.
See_ Pg. 179. Fict. 7.A.1.5.A. in Appendix "B" for a fup
page view of Figure 7.A.1.6.A.
7A.1.8. Except as spedfied in Article 7A.1.g., •
effluent shall be delivered to a disposal ifeld in a
voume per flush of between 6 L and 12 L per square
metre (.07 to .25 gal per square foot) of weeping
!stare/ trench if a disposal field is served by a septk
tank and no other treatment device.
WFsre the vertical and horizontal lines cross
indicates s Soil Texture Classification that may be
used with Article 7A.1.5. to obtain the maximum
effluent loading rate in I'dres per nt2 (gallons per
square foot) per day of effluent to a weeping lateral
trench bottom. •
See P,g.117. Soil Texture in Appendix `B'
Delivering a volume flush enhances distribution and
assists in preventing freezing. Better distribution
enhances treatment and extends the life of the
system. In large systems splitting or sequential
dosing should be considered.
See Pst. 104, Caoacity of Effl~,ent Chambers in
Appendix''
See Pa. ~ 35=Split Disposal Fields in Appendix "B"
See Pa. 182. Fist. DF 1 B in Appendix "B"
See Pg.18g,"Fio. DF 5 in Appendix "B`
See Pg. 185. Fict..OF 6 in Appendix `B"
See P~..187, pia. DF 9 in Appendix "B"
See ~a.188. Fist. DF 10 in Appendix "s"
PRNATE SEWAGE SYST~IS STANDARD OF PRACTCE - 4998
FIR87' EomoN JULY, 2000
Page 43
80 3Jtid
532101StiS~1CH~c'1
bEE8E6LE0b Zt~ZO 966T/LZ/L0
tl5/02/2005 18:1'9 3626231
.... ~ •
AON~N~~'~' ~"'r'+ AT1H tti7
RO pOX a00. BRCJpKB. i~1Xt (~196~-s~S1
~~,PtioreF; (~
ENVIRO7EGH SERVICES
Ray.lus~
4271st St. West
Brooks, A6
T1ROG1 _
TEST REPORT / 08060rt-49Ti
MAY O2, 200a
LAB SAMI~IE $AND CLAY l31LT TEXTURAL
# pEgCRIPTION °~ ~ V' ~&
4976 8AK1 84 18
~ 16
~ SL
r.~'L
4977
4678 BAK2
9AIC3 ~
43 2T 30 C1.1L
4979 ~~ ~ ~ ~' SCL
1 49,e0 BAK'~ 49 2p
3d 31
29 L
Cl
4981
4982 BAKE
8AK7 41
~
Z7
3B .
GUL
4983 8AK8 ~
51 ~
25 ~
Z4 ~
SCL
4984
4986 BAK9
BAK10 57 17 ZB SL
4g0g BAK11 44 Z9 27 CL
TF.,ST METHOD
Repot Authorised By:
~~ upsrvisor ~ Lab Services
Unless otherwise sated, ell samples were rooviwd In good condNison.
Test results are only ~:pr~ of the samptq submitted to the laboratory. as.T REQ~gT'FUITrON +rea34~OSStF~ Door
~-- Thla report should,or<ly be reproduosd a ~uN.
60 3Jdd S3bOlStiS~iH~~l bEEBE6LE0b ZI~Z0 9661/LZ/L0
LAl4:5I1~E
p~~gsFoodr Fa~uY
PAGE 01
APPENDIX C
EID INFORMATION
P.O. Bag 8
550 Industrial Road
Brooks, Alberta
Canada T1R 1B2
Phone: (403) 362-1400
Fax: (403) 362-6206
Email: eid@eidnet.org
May 6, 2005
EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.
Riverbend Atrium One
#115, 200 Rivercrest Drive SE
Calgary, AB.
-' T2C 2X5
Attention: Jatnal Ramjohn
Dear Sir:
RE: CB Area Structure Plan
_ Further to enquil-ies requested by Tara Schmidt, 1 have enclosed information for your
perusal. First is an aerial photo of the area in question. All of the L-1D's works are shown
_ in blue. There is the large canal which runs in a Northerly direction and then takes a ~0
degree turn in an Easterly direction. Thea-e is a buried pipe line which comes off of the
large canal and heads due North following tl-ie two kinks near the settling pond. There is
-- also a small open canal off of the large canal, which heads due \'Jest.
The second sketch is the right of «~ay fir the active buried pipeline. ]t is shown in pink.
There is also a R/\'~' for an abandoned canal and it is shown in yellow.
The third sketch is registered plan 04]0571. It shows the E1D RiW's in relation to the
boundaries of the subdivision.
~" Ms. Schmidts' concern was the placement of a permanent structure. adjacent to the west
boundaly of tl;e abandoned canal R/\AJ. The E1D has no objection to this although one
_ ~~~onders why- a lando~~mer ~~.ould put a permanent structure on the bow;dary line of a
property.
-- Also note that the small canal must be hr~~tected. This may have an impact on the
placenent of permanent structures ot; as n;at;y as four of the lots. 'The lots are of a large
enou`h site that it may not pose a sigt;iiic:rint resv-iction on the locations. of permanent
_ structures.
,~ l trust that this infort;;ation will he usefu}. S};ould you have anv ether questions or
"Where Water Works Wonders"
~,a.stern Irrigation I3istrict
concerns, do not hesitate. to call me at 362-1400.
Yours Truly,
f
- , , ~.
Robert Matoba, Land Administrator
Eastern Irrigation District Land Map
~N/
°iYx
k I I ~ Y~ ~
~ ~ L-=
~~ ~~ ~~ 1:5,087
SpinIIHost
Page 1 of 1 Close
Yage 1 of 1
~'v
"-`""' l
~~ ~
{ ~ !
•~ ~~ {-
4J'/AR ,s
T
i
~
~
~ 5
- 1
h
~ ~ ~~ ~
'«' ~
1f
a r .
s j
"
~`
d
~ ~
1 '
s
!- ~'.
o. J ~
"•
` „ .
.
~
t
y
3
_)
~
t ~
t
.. -_ _
~~, ~~
wt M ~' r.V V ~ +~
•\• ~' Y, w
4 > s
Y: ~
d4.
4
--
{~ ~
i"~•
R
`- ^r
"' ~` w
Y h" n
! . 'r •
!~~ ~
~, ~
~{
r.n __
.~ -~.
-• ~ ~,
•; ~; ,
! >A
•e
w r.. .,, ~ ~ ~0..
~ Z 1
~ ~ r
..
? ~ y ~.
,
j
~ «
r w'%r I
~, i i
;
~ I
2
'
• I
~~
.
~ .,._
,,,.
.m ii
~
rvw ,~t src, ~~ ;,
-f4-ls-~
!~
_.T,.__-. ~T ~.
httn•//1'29 ld7 '21 RR/QninTT/Tmmarliata('hPrlrnntPraviaix~Tiff a~nv7ArtirlaTvrxaTTl-Q~h~r7QR 5/F./')MS
SpinIIHost
rage i of i
http:// 139.142.31.88/SpinII/ImmediateCheckoutPreviewTiff.aspx?ArticleTvUeID=9dbcc298... 5/6/2005
Page 1 of 1 Close