HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-04-20 Committee of the Whole (Regular) MinutesCOUNTY OF NEWELL
Meeting Minutes
Committee of the Whole
April 20, 2026
The Committee of the Whole Meeting of the County of Newell was held in the County Office in
Council Chambers on Monday, April 20, 2026 commencing at 9:00 a.m.
Notice was posted at the front entrance advising the public of the meeting.
CHAIR: D. Baumgarten
COUNCILLORS: A. Skanderup
L. Kopp
H. Johnson
G. Skriver
K. Christman
N.Johnson
B. Hofer
A. Doerksen
STAFF: M. Fenske, ChiefAdministrative Officer
L. Johnson, Director of Corporate Services
K. Halsted, SeniorAssessor
S. Biette, Corporate Seroices Superoisor
M. Harbicht, Director of Municipal Seroices
G. Tiffin, Manager of Planning, Development and Engineering Services
M. Jackson, Planning and Development Supervisor
A. Nielsen, ExecutiveAssistant
1. CALL TO ORDER
Councillor D. Baumgarten called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. EXCUSED FROM MEETING
All members were in attendance at this meeting.
3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
3.1 Minutes - Committee of the Whole (January 29, 2026)
W-06/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR KELLY CHRISTMAN that the Council Meeting minutes be
adopted as presented.
MOTION CARRIED
4. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
W-07/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR ARNO DOERKSEN that the agenda be adopted as
presented.
MOTION CARRIED
Committee of the Whole
April 20, 2026
7. DELEGATIONS
7.1 Assessment of Property in Alberta - K. Halsted, SeniorAssessor
The Senior Assessor provided an overview of how property is assessed in
Alberta. He provided examples of exemptions for farmland and farm buildings
and how the assessment is calculated for split usage operations. The provincial
assessor is responsible for assessment of linear, machinery and equipment, and
railway. Farmland is assessed by the municipal assessor with guidance from the
provincial assessor. Linear assessment includes wells and pipelines, cable,
telecommunications, street lighting, railway, and power. The Senior Assessor
provided an overview of the inspections schedule and displayed a graph and
statistics for assessment categories in the County of Newell over the past five
years.
ARRIVED AT MEETING
M. Harbicht, G. Tiffin, and M. Jackson arrived at 9:40 a.m.
S. Simpson arrived at 9:43 a.m.
The Senior Assessor responded to questions regarding depreciation on wells and
pipelines. The Chief Administrative Officer provided additional information
regarding factors that contribute to increased assessment. The SeniorAssessor
outlined recent changes and new developments such as data centres and solar
energy farms.
Council was given the opportunity to ask questions. The Senior Assessor
explained the assessment inspection process. The Chief Administrative Officer
provided an update on the provincial assessment model review. The Senior
Assessor responded to questions regarding farmland assessment.
LEFT THE MEETING
K. Halsted and S. Biette left the meeting at 10:10 a.m.
RECESS
Council RECESSED at 10:10 a.m. and RECONVENED at 10:21 a.m.
6. NEW BUSINESS
6.1 Proposed Land Use BylawTextAmendmentsforAgricultural Buildings
The Planning & Development Supervisor provided background information on
this item and explained development permit exemptions forAgricultural Buildings
provided that they meet specific criteria, noting that setback requirements still
apply. Development permits are required for agricultural processing
buildings. The Planning & Development Supervisor provided an overview of the
current and proposed fee structures.
Page 2 of 6
Cammittee of the Whole
April 20, 2026
Council was given the opportunity to ask questions. The Planning &
Development Supervisor and the Manager of Planning, Development &
Engineering responded to questions regarding the extent of the problem,
indicating that having a conversation with a developer before construction starts
can prevent costly problems. Planning & Development staff can assist by
indicating the location of road allowances and underground infrastructure to
ensure that buildings meet the required setbacks. The goal is to educate
landowners and developers and assist them with meeting legislated
requirements pertaining to their development before building is complete. The
Chief Administrative Officer provided additional information, indicating that there
are still rules for developments that do not require a development permit. He
provided two recent examples where a preliminary discussion could have
prevented problems. The Planning & Development Supervisor responded to
further questions from Council. Discussion followed regarding definitions for
permanent versus non-permanent structures and timelines associated with
permitted versus discretionary use permits.
W-08/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR GREG SKRIVER that Administration moves forward with
requiring Agricultural Buildings to obtain a development permit.
MOTION CARRIED
LEFT THE MEETING
G. Ti�n, M. Jackson, and S. Simpson left the meeting at 10:58 a.m.
5. BUSINESS FROM MINUTES
5.1 Strategic Priorities Update
The Chief Administrative Officer presented the final report from the strategic
planning session and gave a summary of the strategic priorities
identified. Discussion followed and Council requested that references to the
Eastern Irrigation District be removed from the Irrigation Expansion priority.
W-09/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR HOLLY JOHNSON that the Committee of the Whole
recommend the Strategic Priority Session outcomes, including the Strategic Priorities
Chart, to Council for adoption as amended.
MOTION CARRIED
LEFT THE MEETING
M. Harbicht left the meeting at 11:08 a:m.
6. NEW BUSINESS - continued
6.3 Fire Services Expenditure Review
The Chief Administrative Officer provided background information on this item.
He suggested determining whether some fire apparatus can remain in service
without the Fire Underwriters Level and NFPLI standard rather than conducting a
full fire services expenditure review. Discussion followed:
Page 3 of 6
Committee of the Whole
April 20, 2026
• fire departments with a higher call volume would maintain the highest
level of equipment
• calibrate NFPFl standards to rural fire departments or base on actual
hours used instead of years of service
• smaller fire departments not always receptive to hand-me-down
equipment
. insurers are looking for protected versus unprotected and the distance to
fire hall and hydrant ratings are the most important factors
W-10/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR ARNO DOERKSEN that the Committee of the Whole directs
Administration to bring a scoped work plan, timelines and resource requirements of a fire
services expenditure review focusing on fire apparatus useful life to Council for approval.
MOTION CARRIED
LEFT THE MEETING
L. Johnson left the meeting at 11:30 a.m.
6.4 Proposed Boards & Committees Bylaw
The Chief Administrative Officer provided background information on this item
and outlined a solution that would involve one by/aw that formalizes boards and
committees with clear governance, statutory, or operational value. He reviewed
the list of boards and committees that would and would not be formalized and
responded to questions from Council. Discussion followed.
• The Director of Municipal Services is determining whether the Road Ban
Committee is required
• need to determine how funding will be allocated if divisional recreation
boards are removed, but consistency is a/so required
• consistency is also required for hamlet advisory boards
W-11/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR ARNO DOERKSEN that the Committee of the Whole
provides direction to Administration to formalize only those committees with clear
governance, statutory, or operational value.
MOTION CARRIED
RECESS
Committee of the Whole RECESSED at 11:45 a.m. and RECONVENED at 11:51 a.m.
8. IN CAMERA
W-12/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR HOLLY JOHNSON that we move in camera at 11:51p.m. to
discuss the following matters:
• City of Brooks Recreation Agreement - Advice from Officials - Access to
lnformation Act Section 29.
MOTION CARRIED
Page 4 of 6
Committee of the Whole
April 20, 2026
W-13/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR ADENA SKANDERUP that we move out of camera at
12:06 p.m.
MOTION CARRIED
W-14/26 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR BENJAMIN HOFER that the Committee of the Whole
recommends to Council that the County provide financial support for the Recreation Fee
Assistance (RFA) Program; further, that a defined County contribution toward the
Recreation Fee Assistance Program (e.g., proportional to County usage) be included in
the updated recreation agreement between the City of Brooks and the County of Newell.
LEFT THE MEETING
Councillor H. Johnson left the meeting at 12:06 p.m.
LUNCH
MOTION CARRIED
The Committee of the Whole RECESSED for lunch at 12:06 p.m. and RECONVENED at
12:47 p.m.
ARRIVED AT MEETING
M. Jackson, G. Tiffin, and M. Harbicht arrived at 12:47 p.m.
6. NEW BUSINESS - continued
6.2 Proposed Land Use Bylaw Text Amendments for Data Centres
The Planning & Development Supervisor provided background information on
this item. Currently, there has been one data centre built in the County, and it
was permitted as Industrial Heavy land use. Creating policy specific to data
centres will provide more confidence to developers who want to move into the
County. The Planning & Development Supervisor provided information regarding
two types of data centre and the differing requirements for land and power and
impact to the surrounding area. She outlined the proposed criteria:
• small sca/e energy-integrated data centres could be built alongside
any oil and gas facility or within a hamlet and are more flexible
•/arge scale data centres require Land Use Amendment and public
consultation; deve/oper would a/so be required to do their own public
consultation
• nuisance factors for both include noise, vibration, impact to viewscapes
• anything producing over ten megawatts of energy requires approval from
the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC)
Discussion followed. The Manager of Planning, Development & Engineering and
the Planning & Development Supervisor responded to questions. The
Committee of the Whole provided direction that the information presented today
be formalized and brought to a future Council meeting.
Page 5 of 6