Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-10-31 Municipal Planning Commission (Regular) Minutes~~ County of Newell No. 4 ~. Minutes of Municipal Planning Commission Meeting October 31, 2000 The regular Municipal Planning Commission Meeting of the County ofNewell No.4 was held in the County Office at Brooks, AB on Tuesday, October 31, 2000 commencing at 10:00 a.m. Members Present Chairman C. Baksa Councillors C. Vermeeren R. Steinbach Representatives B. M`Kellar J. Doerksen Planner G. Shaw Recording Secretary P. Hoffinan 1. Call to Order The Planner called the meeting to order. 2. Nomination and Election of Chairman The Planner asked for nominations for the position of Chairman. Councillor Steinbach °' nominated Councillor Baksa. The Planner declared nominations cease. Councillor Baksa assumed the position of Chairman. 3. Nomination & Election of Vice-Chairman The Chairman called for nominations for the position of Vice-Chairman. Councillor Steinbach nominated J. Doerksen. Moved by Councillor Venmeeren that nominations cease. Carried. J. Doerksen assumed the position ofVice-Chairman. 4. Excused from Meeting All members were in attendance at this meeting. 5. Minutes Minutes of the September 26, 2000 meeting were presented to the Commission. Moved by J. Doerksen that we adopt these minutes as circulated. Carried. October 31, 2000 Page 86 V~ Call for Post Agenda Items The Chairman called for post agenda items. 7. Adoption of Agenda Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that the agenda be adopted as amended. Carried. Business from Minutes 12-3 Abandoned Rail Rights-of--Way - Storage of Railway EQUioment The Planner presented an updated report on this item. Direction was given for the Planner to pursue an amendment to our land use bylaw. 14 Business Licences and Permitting The Planner presented an updated report on this item. Moved by J. Doerksen that administration draft a rationale, with pros and cons, as to why we are considering business licences. Carried. 6-1 Permit #2136 - Pt. SW 8-20-14-W4 -Division 8 Brooks Pork Ltd. -Expand Existing Operation Robert Janzen of Brooks Pork Inc. was in attendance to present information on this application. Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we approve Development Application #2136 to allow Brooks Pork Ltd. to expand to 600 sow, farrow to finish, operation within Pt. SW 8-20-14-W4 approving this expansion to occur over a three year period beginning in November 2000 and to be completed by November 2003 subject to the following conditions: 1. That this use be classified as an "Intensive Livestock Operation" being a discretionary use within the A -Agricultural District. 2. That this use comply with all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. 3. That the proposed development shall be located as shown on the site plan submitted August 31, 2000. Any change to this site plan shall require written authorization from the Development Officer. 4. That this approval shall be valid for a total of up to a 600 sow, farrow to finish, operation. This approval is granted for aphased-in approach in which the manure management system is improved in phase one. In phase two, an office building, farrowing and gestation barn are completed along with renovations to the existing barn. Phase three will consist of construction of additional finishing space to meet anticipated demands by packers. Throughout all phases of development, engineered blueprints shall be provided to the Development Officer prior to the commencement of construction. Development approval is granted for a time period from November 2000 October 31, 2000 Page 87 to November 2003. During this time, all phases must be completed. If a variance is required by the applicant to extend the time period beyond the November 2003 ~~ deadline, the applicant shall be responsible for providing a written request two months prior to the expiration date to the municipality. The developer shall notify the Development Officer, in writing, when the maximum number of sows is reached. The maximum number of sows approved in this application shall be satisfied prior to November 2003. Any increase over the approved total shall require a separate development permit application and approval. 5. That the operator shall ensure access to 438 ha (1,082 acres) of cultivated cropped dryland or 219 ha (541 acres) of cultivated cropped irrigated land. The developer shall initiate a manure nutrient management program which will ensure that the soil nutrient levels in the land base are monitored and not allowed to become excessive. The developer shall also ensure that the above number of hectares are made available throughout the time this operation is in existence. A copy of this agreement shall be provided to the Development Officer. Such agreement shall be subject to the Code of Practice. The land base shall be fully utilized. 6. That the manure shall be incorporated into the soil within 48 hours of application and follow the Code of Practice unless as otherwise provided in the Code. No manure shall be applied over frozen or snow-covered soils. Due concern and consideration should be exercised when spreading manure on lands near neighbouring residences by maintaining an adequate separation distance. 7. That the applicant shall provide, to the Development Officer's satisfaction, a manure management plan which includes the following: • Volumes of manure produced on an annual basis; • A cropping plan with expectations of amounts of nutrients to be utilized: -- • Amount of owned lands available for manure utilization: • Number of acres required: • Specific landowners willing to accept manure (if necessary); • Location of owned and non-owned lands where manure spreading will occur (if necessary); and • Commitment to follow the Code of Practice in regard to the spreading of manure from both the applicant and additional land owners (if required). Due care and consideration shall be utilized when spreading manure on lands near neighbouring residences by maintaining adequate separation distance. All waterways on lands utilized for manure spreading should be protected from manure by maintaining an adequate separation distance from these areas. The separation distance will be dependent on the soil, slope and management practices on the land. It is recommended, however, that a distance of not less than 30 m (100 ft) shall be utilized when manure is applied to land. 8. That the developer shall ensure that no manure is spread or transported from this site in the time period of May 15 to September 15 of each calender year. 9. That all surface water drainage from the proposed site must be contained on the subject property and be prevented form contaminating surface or ground water. Any surface runoff from the proposed facility which may come into contact with manure shall be contained and prevented from contaminating surface or ground water. In order to achieve this, it is recommended that, where necessary, earthen berms be constructed to divert surface run off water away from the facilities and divert run off which may be contaminated into the manure storage lagoons. October 31, 2000 Page 88 10. That the developer shall ensure that any water which is to be used in this development is licenced under the terms of the Water Act administered by Alberta Environment. 11. That the developer shall ensure the construction of permanent facilities does not encroach onto Eastern Irrigation District rights-of--way and that the location of such facilities does not impede or endanger the District's ability to perform its activities. The developer must also ensure that manure and waste products are not discharged into the works of the District. 12. That the developer shall prepare an access management plan to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department to accommodate anticipated traffic increases to the subject property. The developer shall contact the Superintendent of Public Works, Mr. Earl Somerville, 362-3504, to determine the requirements and timing of completion for the access management plan. 13. The Minimum Separation Distance is varied for Category 1 being the distance to a single family residence. The closest residence is located within the Category 1 MDS. It is noted, however, that the land owner has waived this requirement and that the MDS for the existing facility is not met by this residence at this time. It is also recommended that a minimum separation of 30 m (100 ft) be provided from any river, creek, irrigation canal or drainage ditch and adequate measures are undertaken to prevent contamination of these water sources. 14. That the developer shall ensure the nozzles for the existing pivot within the SW 8-20- 14-W4M are replaced prior to November 2002 to ensure a downward orientation to reduce the likelihood of nuisance odours being created by the spraying of clarified effluent from the operation. The developer shall be responsible for contacting the Development Officer, in writing, when this change has occurred. No irrigation containing effluent shall be permitted on the SW 8-20-14-W4M until the nozzles on the irrigation pivot are constructed to a downward orientation and the manure management system is operational. The irrigation pivot system for the NW 8-20-14-W4M shall be replaced by one containing downward oriented nozzles before November 2003. All costs associated with these changes shall be the responsibility of the developer. 15. That the developer shall ensure that the in-barn storage of manure is constructed in a manner so as to be "water-tight". The developer shall be responsible for ensuring that the storage facility is properly engineered and constructed. The developer shall have an engineer supervise the construction of the in-barn storage trench and provide certification to the municipality that it was constructed in accordance with approved engineering techniques and construction practices. 16. That the developer shall ensure the proposed liquid manure storage has a hydraulic conductivity which does not exceed 1 x 10-' cm/sec. The re-compacted liner shall have a minimum thickness of 1 m (3 ft) and it shall be properly engineered and constructed. A qualified engineer shall supervise the construction of the liquid manure storage facility and provide certification to the municipality that it was constructed in accordance with approved engineering techniques and construction practices. A leak detection system in the form of piezometer test wells shall be provided with testing of these wells carried out in accordance with accepted standards. The results of these wells shall be provided once a year to the municipality. 17. That the developer shall ensure a site for storage of solid manure will be provided in conjunction with the proposed new finishing barn with a solid manure handling system. The floor of this storage site shall have a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10'' cm/sec and have run-on and run-off-water controls. The floor of any manure storage facility will October 31, 2000 Page 89 ~? be located a minimum of 1 m (3 ft) above the ground water. 18. The developer shall ensure that a minimum of nine (9) months of storage be provided for manure at the subject site. 19. That the developer shall ensure that a time period of up to ten (10) days is used between the time of irrigation and harvest of any crops irrigated with clarified liquids from this operation. Irrigation should be done when wind conditions are suitable to minimize drift. 20. That a specific site shall be identified and maintained as an interim storage location for dead animals. This site should be covered and have suitable drainage material to ensure proper drainage and be protected from predators. This location shall be located a minimum of 40 m from the centreline of the county road and a minimum of 30 m from the proposed barn. Dead disposal by rendering truck is recommended. 21. That all structures and buildings shall be located a minimum of 40 m from the centreline of the county road. 22. That the developer shall ensure the property is maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Officer. 23. That this use shall be subject to inspection by the Development Officer within one year of the decision date to determine compliance with these conditions. 24. That the developer shall ensure that a minimum separation distance of 564 m (1,850 ft) is maintained from the facility to the nearest single residence unless otherwise varied by this approval. Carried. 9. Development Permits 1. Permit #2163 -Plan 8912007, Block A -Division 1 Tobler, Brad &Kingcott, Robin - 2nd Residence -Variance to Land Use B Chairman Baksa declared a pecuniary interest in this matter and left the Council Chambers. Vice-Chairman Doerksen assumed the chair. Robin Kingcott and Dave & Wendy Kingcott were in attendance to present information on this item. Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we approve Development Application #2163 to relocate a modular unit onto Plan 8912007, Block A within Pt. NW 9-21-14-W4 for a period oftime not exceeding five (5) years from the decision date and subject to the following conditions: 1. That this use be classified as a "modular home" being a permitted use within the A - Agricultural District. This use is permitted under Section 31(2) of Land Use Bylaw #1004-90 in which the Municipal Planning Commission may waive requirements stipulating only one dwelling per parcel. The Municipal Planning Commission grants approval for a temporary permit for a period of five years from the decision date. 2. That this use shall comply with all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. 3. That this use shall comply with the provisions of Section 49 of Land Use Bylaw # 1004- 90 pertaining to the A -Agricultural District. October 31, 2000 Page 90 ~~ 4. That this development permit is issued as per Section 31(2) of Land Use Bylaw # 1004- 90. 5. That the development shall be located as shown on the site plan submitted October 17, 2000. Any changes to that plan shall require the written approval of the Development Officer. 6. That this use shall comply with the Alberta Building Code. 7. That the developer shall obtain all required permits (i.e. building, electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation) from an accredited inspection agency. 8. That the developer shall provide to the Development Officer a copy of the building permit prior to the commencement of construction. 9. That the developer shall ensure an adequate supply of water is provided for this use. 10. That the developer shall ensure proper disposal of sewage and waste from this use. 11. That the developer shall ensure that the property is maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Officer. 12. That the developer shall ensure that construction materials, supplies and equipment are stored on the property. 13. That the developer shall ensure the continuous clean-up of construction debris tracked onto the public roadway where access is provided to the property. 14. That the developer shall ensure that the following minimum yard setbacks are maintained for this development. Front Side Flankage Rear *40m 3m *40m 3m * From centreline of any public roadway or secondary highway 15. That the developer shall ensure the modular home is skirted to the satisfaction of the Development Officer. 16. That this development approval is granted only for the relocation of a modular home onto Plan 8912007, Block A within Pt. NW 9-21-14-W4 as provided under Section 31(2) of Land Use Bylaw #1004-90. Any other development will require separate application and approval. This permit shall be granted for a five (5) year time period from the decision date or if the son of the landowner vacates the modular home before this time period is completed. No transfer of this permit to other persons shall be granted. Renewal of this permit shall be at the discretion of the municipality. The developer shall be responsible for applying one month before the expiration of the time period. 17. That the developer shall enter into a development agreement with the municipality as a condition of approval and the cost associated with the preparation and registration of it shall be the responsibility of the developer. 18. That the developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the removal of the modular home from Plan 8912007, Block A within Pt. NW 9-21-14-W4. 19. That the developer shall enter into a road approach agreement with the municipality for the installation of an approach to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. All costs associated with this installation shall be the responsibility of the developer. 20. That the development approval is granted only for a modular unit less that two years old from the decision date. Defeated. October 31, 2000 Page 91 C~ Moved by Councillor Steinbach that, on the basis of the Planner's recommendation, we reconsider this motion. Carried. Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we postpone this motion until later in the meeting. Carried. Chairman Baksa returned to the meeting and resumed the chair. 2. Permit #2165 -Plan 7410502, Block 2, Lot 8 -Division 1 Smit, Phyllis -Moved-in Residence Phyllis Smit was in attendance to present information on this application. Moved by J. Doerksen that we conduct a site inspection and that the applicant be allowed time to meet with the Rolling Hills Advisory Board prior to making a decision on this application. Carried. Lunch The Commission recessed for lunch from 12:00 noon to 12:35 p.m. Business from Minutes (cont'd) 6-2 Permit #2142 -Plan 8111866, Block E, Lot 3 -Division 10 Yanke, Harvey -Construct Oversized Accessory Building & Variance to Land Use Bylaw Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we deny Development Permit #2142 to construct an oversized accessory building within Lot 3, Block E, Plan 8111866. Carried. It was noted that the Country Residential 2 District was created to allow for this type of accessory building, therefore a land use change would be in order. 6-4 Permit #2147 -Plan 8210258, Block 2, Lot 11 -Division 1 Cordes, Leigh & Nicole -Relocate Single Family Residence Moved by Councillor Steinbach that the following motion be lifted from the table: "Moved by Councillorpouglassthat wegrant approval to DevelopmentApplication #2147 to relocate a single family residence, as shown in the colour photographs included with the application, onto Plan 8210258, Block 2, Lot 11 subject to the approval of the conditions to be presented at the October 31st, 2000 meeting." Carried. The Planner reported that this application has been withdrawn. Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that this motion be postponed until later in the meeting. Carried. October 31, 2000 Page 92 11-4 Statutory Planning Within the Vicinity of the Town of Brooks The Planner presented a report on statutory planning within the vicinity of the Town of Brooks. This item was referred to the next Council Workshop Session. 10. Other Business 1. Subdivision Inquiry -Tom Declercg -Division 8 Plan 811799, Block A, Pt. NE 10-20-14-W4 Tom & Claudia Declercg were in attendance to make a subdivision inquiry. Business from Minutes (cont'd) 6-4 Permit #2147 -Plan 8210258, Block 2, Lot 11 -Division 1 Cordes Leah & Nicole -Relocate Single Family Residence (cont'd) The Commission voted on the postponed motion granting approval, with conditions, to Development Application #2147. Defeated. Business from Minutes (cont'd) 11-5 Fee Schedule Revisions for 2001 The Planner presented a revised fee schedule for 2001. This item was referred to the next Council Workshop Session. Development Permits (cont'd) 1. Permit #2163 -Plan 8912007, Block A -Division 1 (cont'd) Tobler Brad & Kin~cott Robin - 2°d Residence -Variance to Land Use Bylaw Chairman Baksa declared a pecuniary interest in this matter and left the Council Chambers. Vice-Chairman Doerksen assumed the chair. The Commission voted on the postponed motion to approve Development Permit #2163 with conditions. Carried. Chairman Baksa returned to the meeting and resumed the chair. October 31, 2000 Page 93 11. Home Occupation Permits ~~~ There were no Home Occupation Permit applications. 12. Subdivisions 1.00 NL 029 -Plan 5280 F.K., Block 6, Lots 9 & 10 -Division 1 Beattie, Harold & Ivy -Residential Subdivision Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we recommend to Council approval of Subdivision Application #00 NL 029 for a lot separation in Plan 5280 F.K., Block 6, Lots 9 & 10, waiving Section 57.4 of the land use bylaw to allow the residence to remain within 7.5 m from the front property line and subject to the applicant entering into an agreement with the County of Newell for the upgrading of the approaches to the proposed and remnant parcels. Carried. 2. 00 NL 030 - Pt. SW 6-19-14-W4 -Division 10 Tomlinson, Gene and Tomlinson, George & Marie -Farmstead Separation Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we recommend to Council approval of Subdivision Application 00 NL 030 for a farmstead separation Pt. SW 6-19-14-W4 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant entering into an agreement with the County of Newell to upgrade the existing approach to the remnant parcel. 2. The registration of a deferred municipal reserve caveat against the remnant parcel. The amount of the municipal reserve required will be calculated at the time the applicant provides a plan of subdivision to the municipality for endorsement. 3. The registration of a caveat for the dedication of 5 metres along the westerly boundary of the subdivided areas for future road widening to be purchased at a rate that is consistent with County Policy at that time. 4. The applicant meeting all requirements of the Eastern Irrigation District with respect to the conveyance of water as well as easements. 5. All oil and gas company leases, rights-of--way, Board Orders, etc. being carried forward, as required, when the subdivision mylar is registered at Land Titles Office. 6. The applicant providing easements to franchise utilities for providing services to the proposed parcel. Carried. 3. 00 NL 031 -Pt. SW 23-17-13-W4 -Division Hellmer, Marvin & Cecilia -Farmstead Separation Moved by B. McKellar that we recommend to Council that they deny Subdivision Application 00 NL 031 for a farmstead separation in Pt. SW 23-17-13-W4. Carried. October 31, 2000 Page 94 4. 00 NL 032 - Pt. NW 28-18-14-W4 -Division 5 ,.~J Timko George & Mona -Industrial Subdivision Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we recommend to Council approval of Subdivision Application 00 NL 032 for an industrial subdivision within Pt. NW 28-18-14-W4 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant providing a service road along the western boundary of the proposed parcel. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of constructing the service road to the satisfaction of the municipality. Access to the proposed parcel will need to be addressed by the Town of Brooks, the County's Public Works Department and Alberta Infrastructure prior to the installation or modification of any road approaches from Secondary Highway #873 to the subject property or other properties in this area. 2. The applicant entering into a development agreement for the construction of a service road or improved approach from Secondary Highway #873. The development agreement may be registered on title at the cost of the applicant. All costs associated with the preparation of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the applicant. If a shared approach is utilized to provide access to the subject property, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the owner of Plan 8011435, Block D, which will be registered on both titles. 3. The applicant providing municipal reserve in the form of cash-in-lieu in an amount to be determined when a plan of subdivision is returned for endorsement. At the time of application, the amount of municipal reserve was determined to be .3838 ha or .948 acres. The applicant may provide their own appraisal of the market value of the subject property at the time of determining the value of the subdivided parcel for the purposes of calculating cash-in-lieu. 4. The applicant meeting all requirements of the Eastern Irrigation District with respect to the conveyance of water as well as easements. 5. The applicant providing easements to franchise utilities for providing services to the proposed parcel. Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we table this motion. Carried. It was noted that the reason for tabling this motion was to allow time for an area structure plan for the area to be completed. Left Meeting Councillor Steinbach excused herself from the remainder of the meeting at 3:05 p.m. 13. Development Report The Development Report for September 20, 2000 to October 25, 2000 was presented to the Commission. Moved by J. Doerksen that we approve this report. Carried. October 31, 2000 Page 95 14. Correspondence F ~ 1. Kay & Riggins -Variance Request -Plan 8310152, Block 1, Lot 8 -Division 2 A request from Kay & Riggins, for a variance to setback requirements for a modular home located within Plan 8310152, Block 1, Lot 8, was presented to the Commission. Moved by J. Doerksen that we grant the following variances to Section 51 of Land Use Bylaw # 1004-90, being CR -Country Residential District: 1) a .36m (1.18 ft) variance to Section 51.5 to allow the mobile home to remain as located and 2) a 1.43 m (4.69 ft) or 1.40 m (4.59 ft) variance to Section 51.7(1) to allow a shed to remain as constructed. Carried. 2. Town of Brooks -Proposed Development of Best Western Hotel Corner of 15`'' Avenue and Centre Street The Town of Brooks circulated to the County, an application for the development of a sixty- four room Best Western Hotel to be located at the corner of 15``' Avenue and Centre Street. Moved by J. Doerksen that the Planner send our comments to the Town of Brooks. Carried. Other Business (cont'd) 2. Area Structure Plan for NW 28-18-14-W4 Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we recommend to Council that the preparation of an -- 'area structure plan for a portion of the NW 28-18-14-W4 be conducted in the following manner: 1.1 The approach to be utilized in the preparation of this plan is to have the consultant prepare an area structure plan with the municipality responsible for the supervision of plan preparation. 1.2 Council direct Administration to contact consultants directly to prepare formal proposals to the municipality. The consultants should be contacted as soon as possible after Council grants approval for the approach to be taken in the preparation of this plan. Members of the Municipal Planning Commission, Council and Administration should be responsible for interviewing and selecting a consultant. 1.3 A committee be established, consisting of a representative from the Municipal Planning Commission, County Council, land owners, Administration and a representative from the Town's Administration, which is to act as a steering committee for the preparation of this plan. 1.4 The objectives of the area structure plan include the following: • determining future land uses for the area; • controlling access and egress to maintain Secondary Highway 873 as a safe and efficient, free-flowing transportation facility; • integrating land use with future transportation, servicing and other infrastructure; • maintaining and improving the appearance of the corridor as a major "gateway" to the Town of Brooks and the County of Newell; ~~~ October 31, 2000 Page 96 ~ describing the sequence and implementation of development in the area; • including the prescribed requirements of Section 633 of the Municipal Government Act as well as any other matter the municipality or steering ~.~ committee may deem essential in the preparation of the plan. l.1 1.5 An open house be conducted prior to a public hearing on the proposed area structure plan to provide public input into the preparation of the area structure plan. We also recommend that Council give direction to Administration to commence preparation of this plan as outlined above. Carried. 15. Land Use Changes There were no Land Use Changes. 16. Post Agenda Items 1. Home Occupation Permit #110 -Plan 9710341, Block 1, Pt SE 8-20-12-W4 Schafer Jan -Home Office - A - Agricultural District -Division 3 Moved by B. M`Kellar that we approve Home Occupation Permit #110 for a home office to be located within Plan 9710341, Block 1, Pt. SE 8-20-12-W4 subject to the following conditions: 1. That this use is classified as a "Home Occupation" being a discretionary use within the A -Agricultural District. 2. That this use shall comply with all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. 3. That this use shall not affect the residential use of the property or adjacent properties and area. 4. That the total number of off-site employees, not including the occupants of the residence, involved with the said occupation shall not exceed two. 5. That there shall be no outside storage of goods or materials, excepted as noted in these conditions. 6. That there shall be no noise, vibration, smoke, dust or odours created from this home occupation which may affect adjacent land owners or development. 7. That this home occupation permit shall be valid for a time period until October 31, 2002. Renewal of this permit shall be subject to the applicants' performance during that time period. The applicant shall be responsible for re-applying one month before the expiry period. 8. That this home occupation permit is granted for a home office for the sale of scrapbooking supplies for photo albums to be operated by the applicant at Plan 9710341, Block 1 (Pt. SE 8-20-12-W4M). Any other type of home occupation shall require a separate application and approval. Carried. October 31, 2000 Page 97 2. Town of Brooks -Subdivision Application 2000 SUB 06 Pt. Lot 3, Plan 9612017. NE 1/4 5-19-14-W4 A letter from the Town of Brooks requesting input on the above-noted subdivision application was presented to the Commission as information. 3. Kimberly Fletcher -Development in Rolling Hilis A letter from Kimberly Fletcher, with regard to development issues within the Hamlet of Rolling Hills, was presented to the Commission as information. 4. Ken King -Development in Rolling Hills A letter from Ken King, with regard to development issues within the Hamlet of Rolling Hills, was presented to the Commission as information. 17. Ouestion Period/Notice of Motion A question period was held. Discussion took place on land use changes. 18. Adjourn Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that the meeting adjourn at 3:40 p.m. Carried. ~ ~Sac~,y CHAIRMAN ~ --~-~ l PLANNER ' October 31, 2000 Page 98