HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-04-24 Municipal Planning Commission (Regular) Minutes~Q~
County of Newell No. 4
Minutes of Municipal Planning Commission Meeting
.-- Apri124, 2001
The regular Municipal Planning Commission Meeting of the County ofNewell No.4 was held
in the County Office at Brooks, AB on Tuesday, April 2-1, 2001 commencing at 10:05 a.m.
Members Present Chairman C. Baksa
Councillors C. Vermeeren
R. Steinbach
Representatives B. M`Kellar
J. Doerksen
Planner G. Shaw
Recording Secretary P. Hoffman
1. Call to Order
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
2. Excused from Meeting
All members were in attendance at this meeting.
3. Minutes
Minutes of the March 29, 2001 meeting were presented to the Commission. Moved by
Councillor Vermeeren that we adopt these minutes amended. Carried.
4. Call for Post Aeenda Items
The Chairman called for post agenda items.
5. Adoption of A enda
Moved by Councilor Vermeeren that the agenda be adopted as amended. Carried.
6. Business from Minutes
10-1 O1 NL 008 - SW 4-21-15-W4M -Division 7
Dyck, Heinz -Farmstead Subdivision
This item was not brought forward.
April 24, 2001 Page 35
U~'!
12-4 00 NL 032 - Pt. NW 28-18-14-W4 -Division 5
Timko, George & Mona -Industrial Subdivision
Myles Longman and Rick Smith, of Vauxhall Co-op Petroleum Ltd., were in attendance to
give information on this application. Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we lift the
following motion from the table: "Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we recommend to
Council approval of Subdivision Application 00 NL 032 for an industrial subdivision within
Pt. NW 28-18-14-W4 subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant providing a service road along the western boundary of the proposed
parcel. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of constructing the service road
to the satisfaction of the municipality. Access to the proposed parcel will need to be
addressed by the Town of Brooks, the Gozmry's Public Works Department and Alberta
Infrastructure prior to the installation or modification of any road approaches from
Secondary Highway #873 to the subject property or other properties in this area.
2. The applicant entering into a development agreement for the construction of a service
road or improved approach from Secondary Highway #873. The development
agreement may be registered on title at the cost of the applicant. All costs associated
with the preparation of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the applicant. If
a shared approach is utilized to provide access to the subject property, the applicant
will enter into an agreement with the owner of Plan 8011435, Block D, which will be
registered on both titles.
3. The applicant providing municipal reserve in the form of cash-in-lieu in an amount to
be determined when a plan of subdivision is returned for endorsement. At the time of
application, the amount of municipal reserve tivas determined to be .3838 ha or .948
acres. The applicant may provide their own appraisal of the market value of the subject
property at the time of determining the value of the subdivided parcel for the purposes
of calculating cash-in-lieu.
4. The applicant meeting all requirements of the Eastern Irrigation District with respect
to the conveyance of tivater as well as easements.
S. The applicant providing easements to franchise utilities for providing services to the
proposed parcel. "
Vote on lifting of the motion. Carried.
Moved by J. Doerksen that we amend this motion by deleting current Conditions 1 & 2
replacing them with the following conditions:
1. The applicant providing road dedication by way of caveat on the proposed and remnant
parcels in the form of a five metre strip of land adjacent to the westerly boundary.
2. The applicant entering into a development agreement for the construction of the
intersection and portion of the collector road as shown in the area structure plan for the
NW 28-18-14-W4. The subdivision plan will include as part of the plan that portion of
the collector road up to the eastern most point of the proposed parcel. The development
agreement being registered on title at the cost of the applicant. All costs associated with
the preparation of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the applicant.
3. The completion and adoption of the area structure plan for the NW 28-18-14-W4 lying
to the south and west of Railway Plan RY 11 prior to endorsement of a subdivision plan
occurs by the municipality.
and renumbering current Conditions 3 & 4.
Vote on amended motion. Carried.
Apri124, 2001 Page 36
Cs~
15-2 Subdivision O1 NL 010 -Plan 9711815, Blocks 1 & 2 (Pt. NE 31-20-14-W4)
Lavern & Eileen Klassen/Gordon Grove -Brian Reinboldt (applicant)
:~--- Residential Subdivision -Division 8
More information is still required on this application.
4. Council Report
The Chairman gave this report
5. Development Permits
1. Permit #2198 -Plan 8011608, Block 1, Lot 1 -Division 10
Steelbrace Construction and Management -Addition to Existing Buildin¢
Moved by J. Doerksen that we approve Development Permit #2198 for an addition to an
existing building on Lot 1, Block 1, Plan 8011608 subject to the following conditions:
1. This use being classified as an "Addition" being a permitted use within the I -Industrial
District.
2. This use complying with all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations,
codes and standards.
3. This use complying with the provisions of Section 54 of Land Use Bylaw #1004-90
pertaining to the I -Industrial District.
4. The proposed development being located as shown on the site plan submitted March 20,
"~ 2001. Any change to this plan shall require written authorization from the Development
Officer.
5. This approval being given only for the construction of an addition to an existing
building within Plan 8011608, Block 1, Lot 1. Any other improvements shall require
separate applications and approvals.
6. This use complying with the Alberta Building Code, where applicable.
7. This use complying with the Alberta Fire Code, where applicable.
8. The developer being responsible for obtaining all required permits (i.e., building,
electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation) from an accredited inspection agency.
9. The developer providing a copy of the building permit issued by one of the accredited
agencies to the Development Officer prior to the commencement of construction.
10. The developer ensuring that the development satisfies the setback requirements of the
I -Industrial District, which are:
Front Side Flankage Rear
*7.5m 3m *7.5m 3m
*Minimum yard distances from subdivision streets or service roads only. Setbacks from
district roads shall be in compliance with those in the General Land Use Regulations.
11. The developer ensuring that the property is maintained to the satisfaction of the
Development Control Officer.
12. The developer ensuring that construction materials, supplies and equipment are stored
on the property.
13. The developer ensuring the continuous clean-up of construction debris tracked onto the
public roadway where access is provided to the property.
Apri124, 2001 Page 37
V
14. The developer ensuring that the addition is faced in the same or similar material and
colour as the existing building unless expressly varied in the building plans submitted
to the municipality.
Carried.
9. Home Occupation Permits
There were no Home Occupation Permit applications.
10. Subdivisions
There were no Subdivision applications.
11. Development Report -March 20, 2001 to April 16, 2001
The Development Report for March 20, 2001 to April 16, 2001 was presented to the
Commission. Moved by B. M`Kellar that we approve this report. Carried.
12. Correspondence
1. Town of Brooks -Application to Amend the Northwest Sector Area
Structure Plan and Land Use Bylaw to Permit Commercial Development
A letter from the Town of Brooks, regarding proposed amendments to their Northwest Sector --
Area Structure Plan and to their Land Use Bylaw to permit commercial development, was
presented to the Commission. The Planner was given direction to respond to the Town of
Brooks stating that we have no objections to these proposed amendments.
2. Town of Brooks -Application 2001 LUB 04
Amendment of Land Use Bylaw - RE: Industrial Park Expansion
A letter from the Town of Brooks, regarding proposed amendments to their Land Use Bylaw
to allow for the expansion of the Industrial Park, was presented to the Commission. The
Planner was given direction to respond to the Town of Brooks stating that we have no
objections to these proposed amendments.
3. Response to Town of Brooks
A letter to the Town of Brooks, with regard to application 2001 LUB O 1, was presented to the
Commission as information.
Apri124, 2001 Page 38
C~7
13. Other Business
-- 1. Proposed Hamlet of Rolling Hills Study
The Planner presented an outline of the proposed Community Development Plan Study for
the Hamlet of Rolling Hills. Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we recommend to Council
approval of the following:
1. That a study be conducted for the Hamlet of Rolling Hills in which the following issues
maybe addressed:
• What building standard can the community accept for future development?
• How can a community's accepted standard be incorporated into a policy?
• Are there acceptable architectural considerations that could be incorporated into
the Land Use Bylaw to establish community standards for this hamlet?
2. That the study be undertaken by a student from the Faculty of Environment Design at
the University ofCalgary and complected by July 1, 2001, or sooner, to the satisfaction
of the municipality.
3. That any recommendations from the study maybe incorporated into amendments to the
Land Use Bylaw or Municipal Development Plan.
4. That County Council authorize the expenditure by Administration up to a maximum of
$4,000.00 from the Contracted Planning Services account from the Planning and
Development 2001 budget.
Carried.
Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we recommend to Council that a computer work station
be provided for additional planning initiatives. Carried.
,-
2. Area Structure Plan -Division 5
Pt. NW 28-18-14-W4 - Timko George & Mona
A draft of the Timko Industrial Area Structure Plan for the Pt. NW 28-18-14-W4 was
presented to the Commission. Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we recommend to Council
that they proceed with first reading of a bylaw to adopt the Timko Industrial Area Structure
Plan as amended. Carried.
Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we recommend to Council a discussion take place with
regard to the naming of County roads in the vicinity of urban areas. Carried.
14. Land Use Changes
There were no Land Use Changes.
Apri124, 2001 Page 39
U~
15. Post Aeenda Items
1. Town of Brooks -Subdivision 2001 SUB 04
SE 33-18-14-W4 and Plan 2165JK, Block C
A letter from the Town of Brooks, with regard to Subdivision Application 2001 SUB 04, was
presented to the Commission. The Planner was given direction to respond to the Town of
Brooks that we have no objections to this subdivision application.
2. Brisbin &Sentis Engineering Inc. -Town of Bassano
Subdivision Application - 14 Lot Commercial Subdivision
A letter from Brisbin &Sentis Engineering Inc., with regard to a 14 lot commercial
subdivision within the Town of Bassano, was presented to the Commission. The Planner was
given direction to the respond to Brisbin &Sentis Engineering Inc. that we have no obj ections
to this subdivision application.
3. Subdivision O1 NL 018 -Plan 9410922, Block 1, Lot 1 (Pt. NW 21-17-13-W4)
Graveland Cliff -Residential Subdivision -Division 2
Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that we recommend to Council that they deny Subdivision
Application O1 NL 018 for a residential subdivision within Plan 9410922, Block 1, Lot 1(Pt.
NW 21-17-13-W4) as this application does not conform to our Land Use Bylaw and has the
potential to interfere with the agricultural operations of the area. Carried.
4. Permit #2207 -Plan 9411173, Block 1, Unit #47 -Division 5
Murray, Darrel & Evelyn -Single Family Resident
Variance to Side Yard Setback Requirement
Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we grant approval for Development Application #2207
to construct a single family residence within Plan 94111173, Block 1, Unit #47 granting a
variance of 0.79 m and 0.88 m (2.59 ft. and 2.89 ft) to Section 62.4 of the land use by-law
whereby the residence may be constructed to within 0.62 m (2.03 ft) and 0.71 m (2.33 ft) of
the side property line as shown in the diagram provided with the application and subject to
the following conditions:
1. This use being classified as a "Single Family Dwelling" being a permitted use within
the RR1 -Resort Residential District.
2. This use complying with all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations,
codes and standards.
3. This use complying with the provisions of Section 62 of Land Use Bylaw #1004-90
pertaining to the RR1 -Resort Residential District.
Apri124, 2001
Page 40
~~
4. The development being located as shown on the site plan submitted April 19, 2001.
Any changes to that plan shall require the written approval of the Development Officer.
-- Approval is given fora 0.79 m and 0.88 m (2.59 ft and 2.89 ft) variance to permit the
foundations of the residence to be located 0.62 m (2.03 ft) and 0.71 m (2.44 ft) from the
side property line of Plan 9411173, Block 1, Unit #47. This variance was provided at
the Apri124, 2001 Municipal Planning Commission meeting. This variance is granted
because, in the opinion of the Municipal Planning Commission, it satisfies the
following:
(a) the proposed development would not
(i) unduly interfere with the amenities of the neighbourhood, or
(ii) materially interfere with or affect the use, enjoyment or value of
neighbouring properties,
(b) the proposed development conforms with the use prescribed for that
land or building in the Land Use Bylaw, and
(c) the proposed development complies with any adopted statutory plan.
5. This use complying with the Alberta Building Code where applicable.
6. The developer obtaining all required permits (i.e. building, gas, electrical, plumbing,
etc.) from an accredited inspection agency.
7. The developer providing to the Development Officer a copy of the building permit
issued authorizing the construction of the single family residence within Unit #47,
Block 1, Plan 9411173 prior to the commencement of construction.
8. The developer ensuring an adequate supply of water is provided for this use.
9. The developer shall ensure proper disposal of sewage and waste from this use.
10. The developer ensuring that the property is maintained to the satisfaction of the
Development Officer.
11. The developer ensuring that construction materials, supplies and equipment are stored
"~ on the property.
12. The developer ensuring the continuous clean-up of construction debris tracked onto the
public roadway where access is provided to the property.
13. The developer providing to the Development Officer authorization from the
Architectural Review Board of the Lake Newell Resort Condominium Association that
the proposed development satisfies the architectural controls for this area. This shall
be provided prior to issuance of the development permit.
14. The development satisfying the minimum yard requirements of the RR1 -Resort
Residential District as otherwise varied by the Municipal Planning Commission at its
Apri124, 2001 meeting. These are:
Front Side Flankage Rear
3m 0.62m & 0.71m 3m 7.Sm
15. The developer ensuring that any deck being constructed as part of the single family
residence within Plan 9411173, Block 1, Unit #47, shall not encroach any closer than
4.5 m to the rear property line.
16. The developer ensuring that all conditions from the Architectural Review Board of the
Lake Newell Resort Condominium Association be complied with.
17. The developer providing to the Development Officer a complete set ofblueprints for the
residence as well as a completed plot plan prior to the commencement of construction
of the single family residence within Plan 9411173, Block 1, Unit #47.
18. This approval being subj ect to the comments from the Condominium Association which
were not available at the time this approval was prepared.
Carried.
.--,
Apri124, 2001 Page 41
5. Variance Request -Lot 5, Block A, Plan 1774LK -Division 5
Variance to Front Yard Setback - CR -Country Residential District
{ Moved by Councillor Steinbach that we grant approval fora 5.17 m and 5.22 m (16.96 ft and
17.12 ft) variance to section 51.5 of Land Use Bylaw #1004-90 being the front yard setback
requirements for the CR -Country Residential District to allow an existing detached garage
to remain as constructed within Plan 1774LK, Block A, Lot 5. Carried.
6. TransCanada Overpass
A discussion was held with regard to the proposed TransCanada Overpass.
7. May's Meeting Date
The date of the May Municipal Planning Commission Meeting was discussed.
19. (question Period/Notice of Motion
A question period was held.
20. Adjourn
Moved by Councillor Vermeeren that the meeting adjourn at 12:06 p.m. Carried.
~~~ A-r-~
CHAIRMAN ~
. ,J
ADMINISTRATOR
Apri124, 2001 Page 42