Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-02-26 Municipal Planning Commission (Regular) MinutesCOUNTY OF NEWEL NO. 4 MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 26, 2008 The regular Municipal Planning Commission Meeting of the County of Newell No. 4 was held in the County Office at Brooks, AB on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 commencing at 10:01 a.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: W. Daniels, Councillor J. Harbinson, Councillor S. Evans, Councillor A. Eastman, Councillor M. Douglass, Councillor H. Wutzke, Councillor A.M. Philipsen, Councilloi- R. Andrews, Councillor B. McKellar, Member STAFF: D. Horvath, Planner - ORiZSC A. Wickert, Development Control Officer K. Stephenson, Chief Administrative Officer D. Sutter, Administrative Secretary OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE: Bantry Bay Estates Delegation, Item 6b: Randy Ftichar, Homes by Us Tom Ftichar, Homes by Us John Banry, Engineer Jay White, Environmentalist Connie Peterson, Midwest Surveys Karen Peters, Midwest Surveys Lana, Midwest Surveys DJ, Midwest Surveys Shawn Torkelson, Items 14a & 13d Sandy Traichel, Item 14a Adjacent Land Owners, Item 13d: Albert Zagorsky Freida Zagorsky `-` Myrna Ferris Cal Cameron Corina Hermus Kerry Andrews Alex McCuaig, Brooks Bulletin 1. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:01 a.m. ~~ 2. EXCUSED FROM ME€JING P-15/08 MOVED BY COUNCILOR R. ANDREWS that S. Swenson, Councillor Schroeder, and Councillor de Jong be excused from the meeting. MOTION CARRIED 3. MINUTES a) January 29. 2008 The following changes were noted: Page 5, Line 2 -change "dinosaur gas line" to read "Dinosaur Gas Co-op Line" Page 8, Motion P-13/08 -delete the words "and grant a permit" Page 9, Line 3 -delete the word "be" P-16/08 MOVED BY COUNCIL~.OR H. WUZKE that the minutes of the January 29, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission meeting be adopted as amended. MOTION CARRIED 4. CALL FOR POST AGENDA ITEMS The Chairman called for post agenda items. 5. ADOPTION OF AGE~~A P-17/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR A. EASTMAN that the agenda be adopted as amended. MOTION CARRIED 6. BUSINESS FROM MI„I,~UTES a) Permit #2818 - Pt. SW 5-18-14-W4M Elizabeth Redelback, Janet Mapes, Ron Redelback (Owners) Ron Redelback (Applicant) Legalize Existing Development -Creation of 14 Additional Lots The County Planner provided a letter that Mr. Strom had written asking for direction with the Area Structure Plan requested by MPC. The County Planner was directed to respond with a letter to Mr. Strom providing specific requirements for the Area Structure Plan that he will bring to MPC. Arrived at Meeting Alex McCuaig arrived at 10:05 a.m. Arrived at Meetina The Bantry Bay Estates delegation arrived at 10:11 a.m. b) Bantry Bay Concept Plan - E ~/z of 32-17-14-W4M, Randy Ftichar / Homes by Us February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 2 c, ~\ ~V Introductions were made by the Board members and staff members ..- present, and then by the Bantry Bay Estates delegation group. Randy Ftichar provided background information on Homes by Us and then presented a slideshow presentation which provided the Board with a more detailed look at the proposed development. The presentation included information on the proposed lot arrangement, land area breakdown, and lot servicing. Mr. Ftichar indicated that he believes that this new development will stimulate the economy of the area. Upon the conclusion of the presentation, the floor was opened for questions. Councillor Harbinson inquired about the distance of the sewage lagoon to Lake Newell. John Barry, an engineer with MMM, stated that the lagoon would be 600 feet away from the lake until the mechanical plant is built. The plant will be 1000 feet away from the lake. He also indicated that the lagoon would contain treated effluent that would be used to irrigate adjacent land during the summer months. Councillor Douglass inquired about the total acreage of the development. Mr. Fitchar stated that the entire development is taking place on approximately a quarter section of land in total. Left the Meeting The Bantry Bay Estates Delegation and Alex McCuaig left the meeting at 10:38 a.m. After the delegation left the meeting, further discussion continued about the proposed development. Councillor Harbinson provided some background information on the previous development proposals for this area. Bruce Mckellar stated that he doesn't feel as though the development should go forward until an agreement is made with the EID and the sewage issue is.fully addressed. Councillor Harbinson would like to see this development tie into the City of Brooks sewage system which would require the developer to enter into an agreement with the city. The County Planner provided more information regarding the next steps in the process, indicating that the first step would be rezoning the property. She also informed the Board that the developer is looking for an indication from MPC as to whether Council would be comfortable having this development move forward. Councillor Daniels reminded the Board that we have to ensure that we are protecting the water supply. He also stated that he feels that a peninsula should not be a location for sewer lines. Councillor Andrews stated that he is concerned with the pipelines to the east where the proposed golf course or tree farm might be located. Councillor Harbinson indicated that the development looks good, but that he wants all of the conditions to be laid out before moving forward. Councillor Wutzke and Councillor Douglass agreed that the developer should be given the opportunity to move forward, but that all issues surrounding the proposed development should be hashed out before the development gets too far along. Kevin Stephenson, County Administrator, stated that he feels the biggest issue that the Board has to deal with, aside from the environment issues, is deciding how much development is desired next to the Lake. The .County Planner asked the Board if they felt that they needed more information before the developer applies to rezone the property. Further discussion ensued regarding the density of development around the lake. The Development Control Officer suggested sending the developer a letter highlighting the concerns including water, sewer, density of development, and development on the peninsula, as outlined in the above discussion. Councillor Eastman February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning commission Page 3 ~f ivy stated that he feels that we should move far enough ahead in the process in order to involve the public and see what their opinions are. The Board decided to leave this item and come back to it later in the meeting. c) Permit #3165 -Lot 12, Block 1, Plan 831 0857, SW 5-18-14-W4 Dennis Bouchard (Owner /Applicant) Single Family Dwelling with an attached garage -variance to rear setback The Development Control Officer provided background information on the proposed development. The County Planner clarified the new proposed site plan indicating that the applicant now only needed 1 variance as opposed to the 3 required with the original site plan. P-18/08 MOVED BY COlJ.NCILLOR H. WUTZKE that the Municipal Planning Commission APPROVE Development Permit #3165 and grant a permit to construct asingle-family dwelling unit with attached garage with a variance 3.Om ('9.8 ft) to the rear-yard setback .The Development Officer recommends that Development Permit #3165 be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) This permit is being granted on for the construction of a single- family dwelling unit with attached garage with a variance 3.Om (9.8 ft) to the rear-yard setback on lands described as Lot 12, Block 1, Plan 831 0857. Any additional development shall require prior approval of a separate permit application. And subject to the following conditions: 2) The proposed development complying with: a. all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. b. the provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments thereto, pertaining to the Resort Residential District. c. any concerns put forth by the County Of Newell Public Works Department. d. any concerns put forth by the Eastern Irrigation District. e. any concerns put for by the various oil and gas companies. 3) The developer ensuring: a. The developer ensuring this development is located as shown on the site plan dated February 4, 2008 approved in this application. Any changes to that plan shall require the written approval of the Development Officer. b. The developer ensuring the design, character and appearance of the proposed building are consistent with other buildings in the vicinity. c. The developer ensuring an adequate supply of water is provided for domestic use. d. The developer ensuring there is proper and legal access provided to the property. e. The developer ensuring the site is graded so that storm water does not drain onto adjoining properties. f. The developer ensuring the property is maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Officer. g. The developer ensuring construction materials, supplies and equipment are stored on the property and not on the public roadway. February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 4 ~~ h. The developer ensuing the continuous clean up of construction debris tracked onto the public roadway where access is provided to the property. i. The developer ensuring the property is not used for conducting a business or commercial operation without first obtaining the required permits. j. The developer ensuring there is no contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater from this use. k. The developer ensuring all outdoor garbage containers are stored in weatherproof and animal-proof containers and are covered and screened from the public roadways. MOTION CARRIED d) Road Closure -Robert & Lois Schmidt - Ptn. NE 9-20-13-W4M & Ptn. NW 10-20-13-W4M The Development Control Officer provided background information on the proposed road closure. She stated that Bruce Penner, Technical Manager at Public Works indicated that the EID allowance should be surveyed, registered as a road plan and purchased. The County Planner informed the Board that the registration process and road closure process could be done at the same time in order to decrease the amount of time the entire process will take. e) Road Closure -Bernice & Robert Dunham -Hamlet of Millicent The Development Control Officer presented pictures that were taken at a site inspection done on February 25, 2008. A recommendation was made to move forward with this road closure. 7. COUNCIL & S.D.A.B. REPORT The County Planner informed the Board that both the Wiens appeal and the Drumm-Laroque appeal had been withdrawn. P-19/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR .7. HARBINSON that the Council & S.D.A.B. Report be accepted. MOTION CARRIED 8. DEVELOPMENT REPORT - ]aNUaRV 22 -FEBRUARY 25. 2008 The Development Control Officer presented the Development Report to the Board. P-20/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR A. EASTMAN that the Development Report be accepted. MOTION CARRIED 9. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence to be presented at this meeting. February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 5 10. a) #2008-0-044 - SE 31-17-13-W4M Rick & Diana Schuett (Owner/Applicant) To subdivide an approximate 6.00 Acre (2.43 Hectare) vacant parcel from an unsubdivided quarter section. The County Planner provided background information on the proposed subdivision. P-21/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR ]. HARBINON that the Municipal Planning Commission APPROVE subdivision #2008-0-044, subject to the following conditions: 1. That all outstanding property taxes shall be paid to the County of Newell. 2. That the applicant or owner or both enter into a Development Agreement with the County of Newell which shall be registered concurrently with~the final plan against the title(s) being created. 3. That the existing access to Highway 525 be relocated to the east to be aligned directly north of the existing municipal roadway or any access point suitable to the satisfaction of Subdivision and Development Authority prior to finalization. MOTION CARRIED 11. AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT SERVICE 8~ HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS a) HO #186 -Renewal - NE 4-17-16-W4M, Division 4 David & Heidi Okell /Big Dawg Swabbing Ltd. (Owner/Applicant) Existing Oilfield Swabbing Service The Development Control Officer provided background information on the proposed home occupation renewal. P-22/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR W. DANIELS the Municipal Planning Commission APPROVE the Home Occupation renewal application, Permit No. 186, and grant a 3-year temporary permit to operate an Oilfield Swabbing Service. 1) This temporary permit is being granted for the operation as a general oilfield swabbing business on lands described as NE 4-17-16, Division 4. Any additional development shall require prior approval of a separate permit application. And subject to the following conditions: 2) This permit, being valid for a time period of three years from the date of approval, at which time it may be either renewed or revoked by the Development Authority under the provisions of the Land Use Bylaw. It is the responsibility of the applicant to renew a minimum of two months prior to its expiration. 3) The proposed use complying with: a. all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. b. the provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments thereto, pertaining to Home Occupation and Agricultural Support Services. 4) The developer ensuring: February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 6 ~~ .-, a. that this use shall not affect the residential use of the property or adjacent properties in the area. b. there is proper and legal access provided to the property. c. the property is maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Officer. d. there is no contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater from this use. e. all outdoor garbage containers are stored in weatherproof and animal proof containers and are covered and screened from the public roadways. f. no noise, vibration, smoke, or dust, which may affect adjacent land owners is created. g. the total number of non-resident, part time and full time employees involved with the said occupation, not exceeding five, unless required for safety reasons. h. that no more than five commercial trucks are used in conjunction with the home industry permit. No other commercial vehicles shall be permitted. i. that there is adequate parking space for this use, up to 4 stalls, within the front yard setback. MOTION CARRIED 12. STATUTORY PLANS -NEW & AMENDMENTS a) Land Use Bylaw Revisions -- The County Planner informed the Board that we are closing in on the 6 month mark of adopting Land Use Bylaw 1626-07. She asked that the Land Use Bylaw review be put on the next MPC agenda for further discussion. 13. DEVELOPMENT PERMITS a) Permit #3167 -Lot 6, Block 4, Plan 051 2650 of NW 19-18-14-W4, Division 5 A.J. Legendz (Owner /Applicant) Existing oilfield dispatch & repair operation The Development Control Officer provided background information on the proposed development permit. This permit was tabled until the afternoon portion of the meeting. b) Permit #3168 -Lot 6, Block 4, Plan 051 2650 of NW 19-18-14-W4, Division 5 1373467 Alberta Ltd. (Alan Jones) (Owner /Applicant) Existing oilfield dispatch & repair operation The Development Control Officer provided background information on the proposed development permit. This permit was tabled until the afternoon portion of the meeting. c) Permit #3169 -Lot 2, Block 1, Plan 821 0258, Hamlet of Rolling Hills Elaine Thomsen (Owner /Applicant) --- Manufactured home February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 7 v ~~ The Development Control Officer provided background information on the proposed development. P-23/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR A. EASTMAN that the Municipal Planning Commission APPROVE Development Permit #3169 and grant approval for the installation of a manufactured home, where the following are required prior to commencement of construction, final approval and issuance of this permit. This permit is being granted only for the installation of a 1520 ft2 manufactured home, on lands described as Lot 2, Block 1, Plan 821 0258. Any additional development shall require prior approval using a separate permit application. 1) The proposed development complying with: a. all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. b. the provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments thereto, pertaining to the Hamlet Residential District. c. The provisions of Schedules 9 & 10 of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments thereto, pertaining to Moved-In Buildings and Manufactured Homes in Hamlets d. the Alberta Building Code where applicable. e. any concerns put forth by the County Of Newell Public Works Department. f. any concerns put forth by the Eastern Irrigation District. And subject to the following conditions: 2) The proposed development complying with: a. all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. b. the provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments thereto, pertaining to the Hamlet Residential District. c. The provisions of Schedules 9 & 10 of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments thereto, pertaining to Moved-In Buildings and Manufactured Homes in Hamlets d. the Alberta Building Code where applicable. e. any concerns put forth by the County Of Newell Public Works Department. f. any concerns put forth by the Eastern Irrigation District. 3) The developer ensuring: a. the following setbacks are maintained for this development: Front Side Rear 20 ft (from roadway) 5 ft 20 ft b. the proposed structure is consistent with the purpose of the land use district and that the design, character and appearance of the proposed structure is compatible with, or exceed the standard of, other buildings in the vicinity. c. the site is graded so that storm water does not drain onto adjoining properties. d. the property is not used for conducting a business or commercial operation without first applying for the required permits. e. adequate supply of water is provided for potable use. f. there is proper and legal access provided to the property. g. the property is maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Officer. h. construction materials, supplies and equipment are stored on the property and not on the public roadway. February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 8 ~ti~ i. continuous clean up of construction debris tracked onto the public `^' roadway where access is provided to the property. j. all outdoor garbage containers are stored in weatherproof and animal-proof containers and are covered and screened from the public roadways. k. no contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater from this use. MOTION CARRIED 16. POST AGENDA a) Agenda packages Councillor Daniels indicated that he would like to have the agenda without the backup information emailed to him at his personal email address. He would also like any of the attachments small enough to download over dial-up to be emailed to him. At the conclusion of the meeting, however, Councillor . Daniels decided that he would try accessing the Council Data drive over his dial-up connection again and would further advise the administrative secretary of whether he still wanted the agenda to be emailed to him. LUN H The Committee RECESSED for lunch at 11:49 p.m. and RECONVENED at 12:52 p.m. 14. OTHER BUSINESS a) Sandblasting in the County of Newell Background information was provided by the County Planner on this item before the delegation arrived. Councillor Harbinson indicated that there was an oilfield company operating on the property earlier. Discussion continued regarding the fact that sandblasting is not specifically listed in the Light Industrial District or the Agricultural District. However, according tb the County Planner sandblasting could be considered as a similar use to a painting or welding repair shop in the Light Industrial District or as an Isolated Light Industry in the Agricultural District. Arrived at meeting Shawn Torkelson, Sandy Traichel, and the adjacent land owners of Development Permit # 3170 arrived at 1:02 p.m. 13. DEVELOPMENT PERMITS CONT'['l d) Permit #3170 -Block 1, Plan 931 1397, Ptn. Of SE 15-18-14-W4 Loren Mitchell (Owner) /Shawn Torkelson, Vortex Sandblasting (Applicant) Operation of a sandblasting and painting business The Development Control Officer provided background information on the proposed development permit. The County Planner outlined the concerns put forth in a letter submitted by the adjacent land owners. An additional letter submitted by Merna Ferris included concerns regarding adjacent country residential parcels. February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Pager9 f~~L ~~( 14. OTHER BUSINESS C I~NT_D a) Sandblasting in the County of Newell Mr. Torkelson indicated that he would prefer to work at the Traichel property. He stated that he would use a blasting tent to alleviate the noise concerns and most of, if not all of the dust concerns that may be brought up by adjacent land owners. Mrs. Traichel indicated that Mr. Torkelson is willing to do anything necessary as far as conditions go in order to work in the County of Newell. The County Planner took a moment to clarify the situation at hand. She reminded the Board that the applicant is looking for direction as to whether or not MPC would be willing to hear an application for sandblasting on the Traichel property. The County Planner then stated that with the new Land Use Bylaw, sandblasting could be considered on the Traichel property. 13. DEVELOPMENT PEF~MITS CONT'D d) Permit #3170 -Block 1, Plan 931 1397, Ptn. Of SE 15-18-14-W4 Loren Mitchell (Owner) /Shawn Torkelson, Vortex Sandblasting (Applicant) Operation of a sandblasting and painting business After receiving confirmation from the Board that they would consider an application to sandblast on the Traichel property, Mr. Torkelson decided to withdraw Development Permit #3170. Mrs. Traichel asked the Councillors to please make sure that they have an opinion on the application based on factual evidence and not solely on the opinions of adjacent land owners. Left the Meetino Shawn Torkelson, Sandy Traichel, and the adjacent land owners of Development Permit #3170 left the meeting at 1:26 p.m. Further discussion continued after the delegation left the meeting. Councillor Daniels indicated that the first application to sandblast on the Traichel property was appealed because of sandblasting not being specifically listed as a use in the Light Industrial District. He believes that sandblasting needs to be listed as a use before any application for sandblasting on the Traichel property can be approved. The County Planner stated that the S.D.A. B. is able to uphold a decision permitting a use not specifically listed in a land use district so long as the interpretation of the definition of that activity being a similar use is correct. The County Planner also indicated that sandblasting was not specifically listed 'rn the Light Industrial District because it is usually done in conjunction with painting or welding, and therefore is not the primary use. The County Planner indicated that she believes that since sandblasting would not be the primary use in a painting or welding shop that an approval would stand if the decision was appealed. Councillor Wutzke stated that he feels that sandblasting should be listed as a discretionary use in the Light Industrial District. Bruce McKellar also thinks that sandblasting should be specifically listed in the Light Industrial District. Councillor Daniels agrees with Councillor Wutzke and Bruce McKellar. P-24/08 MOVED BY B. INcKELLAR that the Municipal Planning Commission February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 10 ~~° recommend to Council that a bylaw be made to amend the Light Industrial District of Land Use Bylaw 1626-07 to include sandblasting as a discretionary use. MOTION CARRIED Left the Meetinca Councillor Wutzke left the meeting at 1:46 p.m. Councillor Harbinson asked for further clarification about why the other application decision was reversed by the S.D.A.B. He also inquired as to the reasons the adjacent land owners presented in support of appealing the Municipal Planning Commission's decision approving the application. 6. BUSINESS FROM MINUTES COhIT'D a) Bantry Bay Concept Plan - E ~/z of 32-17-14-W4M, Randy Ftichar / Homes by Us The Board decided to further discuss item 6a. Councillor Douglass asked whether we should encourage the developer to adjust the proposed plan or encourage him to go ahead with a land use amendment application. The Development Control Officer displayed a map of the adjacent land near Lake Newell which allowed the Board members to see what the other land is zoned. This gave E3~oard members a chance to determine where and how much other development may occur around Lake Newell. Councillor Douglass inquired as to how long ago the Lake Newell Resort development began. Councillor Daniels indicated that the Lake Newell Resort development has been established over approximately the last 15 years. Councillor Philipsen asked the Board what the County Planner should tell the developer if he phones to see how the presentation went. Councillor Daniels stated that he is against the application moving forward. Councillor Andrews stated that just because previous developers working at Lake Newell may have been hard to deal with, that we shouldn't be putting these people into the same category. Councillor Douglass asked if we need a bigger idea of what we foresee happening around Lake Newell. The consensus seems to be that the Board is in favour of the application moving forward as long as a set of conditions are laid out right from the start. Councillor Daniels stated that there will need to be a public access to the water. The County Planner asked the Board if the Area Structure Plan presented today is sufficient to present to Council in support of a Land Use Amendment application. The County Planner will also check with the developer in regards to whether or not having phase 3 of the development will make or break their plan as MPC is not totally comfortable with having development on the peninsula. 11. DEVELOPMENT PERMITS CONT'D a) Permit #3167 -Lot 6, Block 4, Plan 051 2650 of NW 19-18-14-W4, Division 5 A.J. Legendz (Owner /Applicant) Existing oilfield dispatch & hauking operation The Development Control Officer provided further background information on the proposed development permits #3167 and #3168. P-25/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR 7. f1ARBINSON that the Municipal Planning Commission APPROVE Development Permit #3167 and grant a permit February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 11 1~~~'~~ to allow the existing business to continue operating in its present location. The Development Officer recommends that Development Permit #3167 be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) This permit is being granted for the existing oilfield dispatch & hauling business, on lands described as Lot 6, Block 4, Plan 051 2650. Any additional development shall require prior approval of a separate permit application. And subject to the following conditions: 2) The proposed development complying with: a. all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. b. the provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments thereto, pertaining to the Industrial District. c. all Alberta Building Codes, where applicable d. any concerns put forth by the County Of Newell Public Works Department. 3) The developer ensuring: a. The developer ensuring there is proper and legal access provided to the property. b. The developer ensuring the site is graded so that storm water does not drain onto adjoining properties. c. The developer ensuring construction materials, supplies and equipment are stored on the property and not on the public roadway. d. The developer ensuring the continuous clean up of construction debris tracked onto the public roadway where access is provided to the property. e. The developer ensuring there is no contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater from this use. f. The developer ensuring all outdoor garbage containers are stored in weatherproof and animal-proof containers and are covered and screened from the public roadways. MOTION CARRIED b) Permit #3168 -Lot 6, Block 4, Plan 051 2650 of NW 19-18-14-W4, Division 5 1373467 Alberta Ltd. (Alan Jones) (Owner /Applicant) Existing oilfield repair operation The Development: Control Officer provided further background information on the proposed development permits #3167 and #3168. P-26/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR ]. HARBINSON that the Municipal Planning Commission APPROVE Development Permit #3168 and grant a permit to allow the existing business to continue operating in its present location. The Development Officer recommends that Development Permit #3168 be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) This permit is being granted for the existing business to inspect and repair oilfield commercial vehicles, on lands described as Lot 6, Block 4, Plan 051 2650. Any additional development shall require prior approval of a separate permit application. And subject to the following conditions: 2) The proposed development complying with: a. all Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and standards. February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning Commission Page 12 ~1~ .- b. the provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments thereto, pertaining to the Industrial District. c. all Alberta Building Codes, where applicable d. any concerns put forth try the County Of Newell Public Works Department. 3) The developer ensuring: a. The developer ensuring there is proper and legal access provided to the property. b. The developer ensuring the site is graded so that storm water does not drain onto adjoining properties. c. The developer ensuring construction materials, supplies and equipment are stored on the property and not on the public roadway. d. The developer ensuring the continuous clean up of construction debris tracked onto the public roadway where access is provided to the property. e. The developer ensuring there is no contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater from this use. f. The developer ensuring all outdoor garbage containers are stored in weatherproof and animal-proof containers and are covered and screened from the public roadways. MOTION CARRIED 16. IN CAMERA ITEMS There were no in camera items. ~^ 17. QUESTION PERIOD Councillor Eastman inquired about putting in an application to subdivide his yard in order clarify terminology used on subdivision resolutions. The County Planner informed the Board that for this example, the existing use would be listed as "Agricultural".and the proposed use would be listed as "Country Residential." Councillor Eastman feels that this might be confusing for the public reading the minutes. The County Planner further explained the reasons behind the use of the terminology stem back to the old planning commissions. 18. INFORMATION ITEMS None 19. AD.70URN P-27/08 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR A. EASTMAN that the meeting adjourn at 2:23 p.m. MOTION CARRIED ~, ~~~^. CH~MA.N..~,,~.,.., "C-" ,,~, r A INIS TOR February 26, 2008 Municipal Planning mmission Page 13