HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-04-14 Municipal Planning Commission (Regular) MinutesCOUNTY OF NEWELL NO. 4
MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
~ April 14, 2009
The regular Municipal Planning Commission Meeting of the County of Newell No. 4 was
held in the County Office at Brooks, AB on Tuesday, April 14, 2009 commencing at
10:00 a.m.
MEMBERS
PRESENT: M. Douglass, Councillor
W. Daniels, Councillor
J. Harbinson, Councillor
S. Evans, Councillor
A. Eastman, Councillor
B. DeJong, Councillor
H. Wutzke, Councillor
A.M. Philipsen, Councillor
I. Schroeder, Councillor
R. Andrews, Councillor
S. Swenson, Member
B. McKellar, Member
ABSENT:
STAFF: D. Horvath, Planner - ORRSC
L. Johnson, Assistant Administrator
D. Lester, Development Control Clerk
M. Harbicht, Superintendent of Public Works
OTHERS IN
ATTENDANCE:
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the. meeting to order at 10:01 a.m.
2. EXCUSED FROM MEETING
All members were present.
3. MINUTES
a) March 10, 2009
P-30/09 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR 7. HARBINSON that the minutes of the March
10, 2009 Municipal Planning Commission meeting be adopted as presented.
~ MOTION CARRIED
The Chairman called for post agenda items.
5. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
P-31/09 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR A. EASTMAN that the agenda be adopted as
amended.
MOTION CARRIED
Arrived at Meeting
Jody Bouchard arrived at 10:04 a.m.
6. DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
a) DP #3289 -Lot 1, Block 1, Plan 811 1352, Ptn. SE 5-19-15-W4M,
Division 5
Kim and Jody Bouchard (Owner /Applicant)
Addition to existing dwelling -variance required for setback distance
to road
The Development Control Clerk provided background information on
the proposed development permit. The County Planner directed the
Commission to the Country Residential section of Schedule 2, and to
Schedule 4, Standards of Development for information regarding
setbacks.
P-32/09 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR ). HARBINSON that the Municipal Planning
Commission APPROVE Development Permit #3289 and grant approval
for the construction of an addition to an existing dwelling granting a
23.6 ft (7.18 m) variance to the setback requirement from a County
road, subject to the following conditions:
This permit is being granted only for the construction of a 1600 ft Z
(148.6 mZ) addition to the existing dwelling with a 23.6 ft (7.18 m)
variance to the setback requirement from a County road, on lands
legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Plan 811 1352, SE 5-19-15 W4M.
Any additional development shall require prior approval of a separate
permit application.
The proposed development complying with:
a) All Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and
standards.
b) The provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments
thereto, pertaining to the Country Residential District.
c) All Alberta Building Codes where applicable.
And subject to the following conditions:
a) The developer obtaining any required permits, which may include
electrical, heating & ventilation, gas and/or plumbing from an
accredited inspection agency.
April 14, 2009 Municipal Planning Commission Page 2
b) The developer providing the Development Officer with a copy of the
building permit issued by a licensed, accredited building inspection
!'` agency for the County of Newell.
c) That this development is located as shown on the site plan approved
in this application and submitted March 6, 2009. Any changes to
that plan shall require the written approval of the Development
Of>:ICer.
d) That the following setbacks are maintained for this development:
Front (east): 100 ft (30 m)
Side (south): 74.86 ft (22.82 m)
Rear (west): 20 ft (2.1 m)
Side (north): 20 ft (2.1 m)
e) That the property is not used for conducting a business or
commercial operation without first obtaining the required permits.
MOTION CARRIED
b) DP #3283 -Lot 15, Block 2, Plan 041 1757, NW 20-21-18-W4M,
Division 6
Town of Bassano (Owner) / ]im Hrymack (Applicant)
Construction of an aircraft hangar
The Development Control Clerk provided background information on
the proposed development permit. Councillor Eastman inquired about
height restrictions at an airport. The Development Control Clerk
indicated that there are currently no height restrictions in our Land
Use Bylaw.
P-33/09 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR S. EVANS that the Municipal Planning Commission
approve Development Permit #3283 as a use that meets the provisions of the
Public Service District of County of Newell Land Use Bylaw 1626-07, and
subject to the following conditions:
This permit is being granted only for the construction of a 3600 ftz
(1097 mz) aircraft hangar on lands legally described as Lot 15, Block 2,
Plan 041 1757, NW 20-21-18 W4. Any additional development shall
require prior approval of a separate permit application
The proposed development complying with:
a) All Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and
standards.
b) The provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments
thereto, pertaining to the Public Service District.
c) All Alberta Building Codes where applicable.
And subject to the following conditions:
a) The developer obtaining any required permits, which may include
electrical, heating & ventilation, gas and/or plumbing from an
accredited inspection agency
b) The developer providing the Development Officer with a copy of the
building permit issued by a licensed, accredited building inspection
agency for the County of Newell.
April 14, 2009 Municipal Planning Commission Page 3
c) The developer obtaining and complying with a Private Sewage
Disposal System Permit. A copy of this permit must be submitted to
the Development Officer.
d) That this development is located as shown on the site plan approved
in this application and submitted March 10, 2009. Any changes to
that plan shall require the written approval of the Development
Officer.
e) That the following setbacks are maintained for this development:
Fr n (East) i e (North & South) Rear (West)
20 ft (6.1 m) 10 ft (3.0 m) 20 ft (6.1 m)
f) That the property is not used for conducting a business or
commercial operation that is unrelated to aircraft operations, and
without obtaining the required permits.
f) That the property is not used for residential purposes
g) That the property is not used for storage (Town of Bassano
condition)
h) That the hangar is constructed within 12 months of issuance of this
permit (Town of Bassano condition)
i) That access can be provided for Emergency Services vehicles to all
sides of the building.
MOTION CARRIED
c) DP #3286 -Block B, Plan 6368 FF, NW 9-23-16-W4M, Division 9
Richard Hiebert (Owner /Applicant)
Installation of a 2008 manufactured home
The Development Control Clerk provided background information on
the proposed development permit. The County Planner suggested that
an informative be added advising the developer that Alberta
Environment is required to drill a well.
P-34/09 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR M. DOUGLASS that the Municipal Planning
Commission APPROVE Development Permit #3286 and grant approval for the
installation of a 2008 manufactured home, subject to the following conditions:
This permit is being granted only for the installation of a 2008, 1200 ft2
(111.5 mZ) manufactured home, on lands legally described as Block B,
Plan 6368FF, NW 9-23-16 W4M. Any additional development shall
require prior approval of a separate permit application.
The proposed development complying with:
a) All Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes and
standards.
b) The provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments
thereto, pertaining to the Hamlet Residential District ~ Schedule
8: Development Standards for Mobile Homes within Hamlets
c) All Alberta Building Codes where applicable.
d) Any other required permits, including electrical, heating &
ventilation, gas and/or plumbing. These must be obtained from an
accredited inspection agency
e) If the applicant intends to provide well water for this dwelling, he is
required to obtain Alberta Environment approval for the installation
of the well. This development permit approval does not override or
April 14, 2009 Municipal Planning Commission Page 4
negate any approvals from Alberta Environment in the provision of a
well for this dwelling.
And subject to the following conditions:
a) That this development is located as shown on the site plan approved
in this application and submitted February 25, 2009. Any changes to
that plan shall require the written approval of the Development
Officer.
b) That the developer obtain an building permit issued by a licensed,
accredited building inspection agency for the County of Newell. A
copy of this permit must be submitted to the Development Officer.
c) That the developer obtain a Private Sewage Disposal System Permit,
issued by a licensed, accredited building inspection agency for the
County of Newell. A copy of this permit must be submitted to the
Development Officer.
d) That the developer enter into Road Approach Agreement with the
County of Newell. This agreement is for the installation and/or
upgrade of any required road approaches to the parcel. If required,
the agreement shall be registered as a caveat against the lands, at
the applicant's expense.
e) That the following setbacks are maintained for this development:
Front Side Rear
ft (6.1 m) 5 ft (1.5 m) 20 ft (6.1 m)
MOTION CARRIED
,~-. d) DP #3287 - NE 19-16-14-W4M, Division 2
Eastern Irrigation District (Owner) /Earl Wilson (Applicant)
Expansion of the existing Rolling Hills Reservoir Campground
The Development Control Clerk provided background information on
the proposed development permit. A response has not been received
from Alberta Transportation regarding this application. Construction
must not occur until approval from Alberta Transportation has been
obtained.
P-35/09 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR A. EASTMAN that the Municipal Planning
Commission APPROVE Development Permit #3287 as a use that complies with
the provisions of the Public Service Land Use District of County of Newell Land
Use Bylaw 1626-07, subject to the following conditions:
This permit is being granted only for the expansion of the existing
Rolling Hills Reservoir campground, from 100 sites to 170 sites, on
lands legally described as NE 19-16-14 W4. Any additional
development shall require prior approval of a separate permit
application
The proposed development complying with:
a) All Federal, Provincial and Municipal statutes, regulations, codes
and standards.
~,.., b) The provisions of Land Use Bylaw #1626-07, and amendments
thereto, pertaining to the Public Service District.
And subject to the following conditions:
April 14, 2009 Municipal Planning Commission Page 5
a) That this development is located as shown on the site plan
approved in this application and submitted March 6, 2009. Any ;
changes to that plan shall require the written approval of the
Development Officer.
b) That no construction shall commence until approval from Alberta
Transportation has been obtained.
MOTION CARRIED
7. BUSINESS FROM MINUTES
a) Redelback Update
The County Planner provided an update on the Redelback Property. A
letter has been received from Strom & Associates providing an update
on the status of the lot septic and water system evaluation. The
Commission inquired about whether or not there is a moratorium on
development on the Redelback Property. The County Planner stated
that there is not a moratorium on development, but since the parcel is
zoned direct control, any application for new development will be
brought to Council. At this point, we are still waiting for a concept plan
to be submitted by Strom and Associates Ltd.
8. DEVELOPMENT REPORT -MARCH 3 -APRIL 7. 2009
P-36/09 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR W. DANIELS that the Development Report be
accepted.
MOTION CARRIED
9. OTHER BUSINESS
a) Further discussion about 09 LUA 002 -PAL Developments
The Planner provided an update on the file and is looking for comments
from the Commission. Councillor Schroeder inquired about how sewage
disposal will be addressed. The County Planner indicated that the
developer plans to use a communal septic system known as the Orenco
System. The system involves a communal septic geld for gray water,
and a communal septic tank for solids. Orenco Systems are sanctioned
by Alberta Environment, but require maintenance and supervision from
a Wastewater Technologist. More specific information is still needed
from the developer regarding who will supervise the system. In the
future, this type of system could be tied into an urban system as the
waste water will be treated prior to entering a different system. S.
Swenson inquired about the number of industrial parks already in
existence around the City of Brooks with empty lots. She noted that the
roads in this area are not great. The County Planner indicated that it is
not our place to say whether or not the market for another industrial
park is good or not. Any upgrades to existing infrastructure would be
dealt with by Alberta Transportation and/or a development agreement
with the County.
Arrived at Meeting
Mark Harbicht arrived at 10:33 a.m.
April 14, 2009 Municipal Planning Commission Page 6
1 ~! I
10. POST AGENDA
~ a) Letter from Alberta Transportation Re: De-Designating SH 542
The County Planner provided an overview of the letter received through
the IMDP Referral process. Secondary Highway 542 is a well developed
area of the County. This creates a problem for Alberta Transportation
and their access management strategy because SH 542 is designated as
a future multi-lane highway. Councillor Wutzke indicated that SH 542
may be part of a potential ring road which could require road widening.
Councillor Schroeder indicated that he believes that we should lobby for
control of SH 542. He also indicated that an extra lane would assist with
traffic flow. Councillor Andrews stated that we should wait and see what
happens with the request sent to Alberta Transportation about SH 873
before negotiating a deal to de-designate SH 542. M. Harbicht indicated
that SH 542 was originally paved because it was the only link between
Brooks and Highway 36. The Commission decided to wait and see what
Alberta Transportation will give us for taking over the road. Once a
response is received regarding SH 873, a response will be sent to
Alberta Transportation about the de-designation of SH 542.
Left the Meetinca
Mark Harbicht left at 10:51 a.m.
b) Comments about the Planning and Development Department to add to
the CAO Appraisal
~-• Councillor Douglass informed the Commission that the CAO Performance
Evaluation Committee is working to complete the CAO's performance
appraisal. They are looking for input from the Commission about the
Planning and Development Department. More specifically, Councillor
Douglass asked the Members at Large for their opinion. The Members at
Large agreed that they do not get as much information ahead of time as
Council does for Planning and Development issues that go to Council
rather than MPC. Currently, the Members at Large have some minor
technical issues to work out with their laptops and connecting from
home. They are sent copies of all of the Council minutes and also have
access to the minutes on the MPC data drive. They feel that although
their individual votes count for less, it is better having full Council on
MPC.
Councillor Douglass also asked for input regarding the contract planning
service that we receive from the Oldman River Regional Services
Commission. A discussion followed regarding the pros and cons of having
a contract planning service versus an in-house planner. The Commission
agreed that Diane Horvath is an excellent asset of the planning and
development department, although it would be nice if she had a few
office days per month here. The County Planner indicated that Lenze
Kuiper, Manager of ORRSC, is going to be coming to meet with MPC
sometime in the next few months in order to discuss the services
provided and any changes that we would like.
April 14, 2009 Municipal Planning Commission Page 7
11. IN CAMERA ITEMS
There were no in camera items.
12. QUESTION PERIOD
None
13. ADJOURN
P-37/09 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR R. ANDREWS that the meeting adjourn at
11:12 a.m.
MOTION CARRIED
~S
CHAIRM
A T. A MINIS TOR
April 14, 2009 Municipal Planning Commission Page 8